Sorry to be skeptic...
but I feel like this is just a scam a la The Turk; it is more likely just security researchers hidden away who know what they're doing and got hired by Anthropic, likely utilising Claude for some aid.
76 publicly visible posts • joined 20 Aug 2025
> The browser you're looking for is Firefox. Worth it, even despite its own imperfections.
I'd personally recommend against using Firefox, or any other Gecko-based browsers, if you care about security, due to their rather weak sandboxing.
Plain-old Chromium is my recommendation after toggling off the few telemetry options present.
This is the way if you care about security.
You probably know it already but just making sure others here know, but Firefox on Android doesn't even internally sandbox web content; it just relies on Android's built-in app sandbox, unlike Chromium browsers on Android, which uses both.
So is Firefox, it's just that more security researchers are fuzzing and keeping a tab on Chromium.
Mozilla does not give a shit about security: the fact that Firefox on Android doesn't even have an in-browser sandbox speaks for itself.
And yes, feel free to grab your weapon of choice and hunt me down for daring to not be positive of Firefox.
Security-conscious "AI" agent? Is this some kind of joke?
I try to avoid LLM things, and certainly projectsabominations suffixed with "Claw". Like even for folks who don't care about security, they're completely useless; unless they're too lazy to even just walk to the microwave and heat frozen pizza. Unfortunately, that is probably the case, humans are lazier than lazy.
And on the topic of LLM things to avoid, also includes projects which utilise vibe-coding, like these Claw-things. Why? (you already know it) It shows that the maintainers are one or more of the following: not capable of maintaining the project; lacks interest in the project; unserious; don't care about stability nor security. The worst part is that projects which do aren't transparent about it, so one has to check for telltale signs...
Anyway, I apologise for the rant, just tired of all the "AI" crap I get force-fed every day.
You've probably read this, but here you go.
> the full-fat GNOME-based edition runs well – even on low-end computers
No it doesn't; it's even more bloated than it ever has been!
I can barely run Cinnamon on a 3 year old budget (maybe around €200-300) ASUS laptop for a tech illiterate relative.
I don't want to imagine how GNOME's gonna run on it...
Disagreed. While Chrome itself is pure rubbish, Chromium itself and some forks (particularly Vivaldi) give Firefox a huge whopping in terms of security.
Firefox is still behind Chromium in sandboxing and other security features. And yes, uBO is castrated on Chromium, however I haven't found any practical difference between the MV2 and MV3 version (YMMV).
Personally I will stay with Vivaldi until Mozilla ups their game. But even then I am not sure since Firefox also shoehorns "AI" into the browser...
Finally, before I shut my gob, as everyone knows here, Chromium has had more zero-days, but I am pretty sure that's because there are more eyes on that codebase than Firefox's.
I agree 110%, and I notice something similar regarding the term "Custom ROMs", which I think "downgrades" some serious alternative Android distributions like LineageOS or GrapheneOS, and makes them sound like hobby projects made by some random guy in their basement, which they really aren't (especially the latter).
I just think it's straight up bizarre that the Android community clings on to that outdated and derogatory term. Like, for instance, Do you think it makes sense to say "screw Windows, I'm gonna flash this Linux ROM on my computer"? No. Then why should Android be so different?
> "Not leaving on-site labels for anything that is very out of the ordinary is shoddy. Yes, including kit that has been decommissioned but left in the rack: masking tape and a sharpie, at the minimum.
THAT is the sort of IMMEDIATE documentation that was missing!"
Amen.
Like code, I think the same should apply to hardware -- What [the hardware] does should be self-explanatory, and if it can't be, then document it!
It was already bound to happen, and unfortunately Steve was the chosen one.
Honestly, the person who set that shit up should've been fired. And they should've, at the very least, documented it or have put it inside a basement far away with signs saying "Beware of the leopard".
"Why not simply allow me to play with Linux and packages in the normal way ? Why would I want a Linux distro that acts against me like my mobile phone ?"
Because it's all about security, which is why immutable distributions are appealing - you can't fsck up your core system with malware if it's read-only.
The REAL threat of "AI" is the fact that humans anthropomorphise LLMs, despite the fact that it's just glorified autocorrect.
Sure, you might see no issues with that, but the problem is that this just legitimises the myth that LLMs are "intelligent" -- to the point that you eventually can't criticise any LLMs because everyone thinks everything that it poops out is correct and "thought through". Don't think these people exist? I have meet grown-up adults who call LLMs by pronouns like "she/him" and thinking it has feelings, but, in my eyes, this seems like some serious schizophrenia, but if it is, then it is very commonplace - since basically all the proles in society are affected by this.
I mean if you want to live with memory safety bugs, which accounts for circa 70% of all security vulnerabilities, then keep on using your beloved C-written coreutils.
"But probably people like you do still envy Windows has a decent GUI and applications - despite Nadella working hard against that -, while Linux desktops still look designed and implemented by amateuers without a clue about good UIs, and have to sput out it on each occasion."
First of all, yes, Windows has decent GUI. But its applications? No way. Most of M$'s applications are a steaming pile of Electron crap, with tonnes of useless UI clutter and notifications about turning on "AI". GNU/Linux doesn't have that, or to be more accurate, most DEs do not. For instance, look at Cinnamon, Linux Mint's in house DE, it's having none of that worthless crap Windows - and by extension, Microsoft - keeps shoving down your throat, and it still, in my opinion, manages to look pretty much the same as Windows' UI. Which is what you want, isn't it?
I also disagree with your statement that "Linux desktops still look [like they're] designed and implemented by amateuers[sic]". Why? Because it doesn't apply to ALL DEs. If you meant just GNOME - the DE meant for iPads -, I get you, but if you're talking about Elementary's DE (Pantheon), for example, then I'd strongly disagree, because it looks like a modern macOS UI. But don't get me wrong, my point is not to state which DE is the best, though - that's everyone's own opinion. My point is that you can't just throw shit at all DEs and say they all look "amateur" just because you've used GNU/Linux once with some shitty DE nobody likes anyway - like GNOME.
To be honest, Windows Enterprise is sane enough to use for work-related stuff, because at least you aren't forced to use an M$ account and you can turn off the shittiest settings with the Windows Registry.
For your use case, which is a rather unique one, I totally understand. But personally, I've found my solution to work better.
Just open `cmd.exe`, and write the following command:
>deltree /s C: [2]
Now restart your computer and all shall be well!
---
[1] Well, unless you work for an employer which insists on using Windows, but in that case you should quit your job and find less of a dogshit employer. But I guess doing the latter is the hard part...
[2] I haven't used Windows for eternities so the command-line guide may be somewhat out-of-date. Send me a PR if it is!
I agree, WASM is just a useless gimmick with a sexy attack surface. Sure, there's some applications where it's useful, but overall it's, like you say, pretty rubbish.
Also yeah, updating Chrome is a no-go - if you even have that AI-hog of a browser installed in the first place. However, a non-AI Chromium browser, a lá Vivaldi, with NoScript and V8 optimiser disabled is pretty well hardened, or at least so I think.
So you’re more worried about statistical analysers being “better” (if that’s even possible) to rivals like China than climate change — which obviously will be a far greater issue to humanity than some fscking autocorrect-on-steroids programme.
Please get some anti-schizophrenic medications soon!
Impressive? For today's standards, yes, absolutely. But, 30 years ago, nah, this would be humongous!
Either way, this all just goes to show how bloated OSes are today. And sadly, GNU/Linux seems to be taking a similar path, especially since Agent P got involved and embedded the daemon equivalent of Emacs into the OS.
Just pin your dependencies, dammit!
Even better, don’t install worthless packages which you can implement yourself.
Sure, the don’t-reinvent-the-wheel folks would disagree, but this is the prise you pay for “trusting” a semi-unknown dev on the internet. Like, why do you even need a package like is-arrayish in the first place?!