"...the eruption of SARS..."
The only eruption related to SARS was the scaremongering FUD in the press.
The actual disease was more of a damp squib.
Anyone up for a bet on what the next "pandemic" non-event will be?
9436 publicly visible posts • joined 5 Oct 2007
As I've said before, it's not about reliability.
If something of yours gives up, it'll be one of your somethings and TPTB will be looking for someone to blame.
If you've stuck everything in a cloud when, not if, it goes titsup.com your entire business will be on the floor and TPTB will be looking for someone to sack.
The SaaS system would be good value...
Er, no. It doesn't matter how much bullshit you apply after this, still no.
Remember that "locked in with limited change options[1]" contract that dropped you in this pile of shit in the first place? Same thing.
[1] Unless you pay at "got you by the balls and we're going to squeeze really hard" rates.
...but the TCP/IP stack stubbornly failed to LOADHIGH resulting in even crapper PC performance."
There was a hack for that sort of thing that I used to dine out on at the time. Chuck whatever monolithic pile of shite ${network} had foisted on you as a client in the bin. Chuck on the Novell card driver for your hardware and the link support layer from the ODI stack. Then load the Novell client for your network onto the LSL[1]. Even if the (now much smaller) client wouldn't LOADHIGH, the fact that the heavy lifting bit would took the edge off.
Also the Novell drivers and LSL were bloody bulletproof, whereas whatever ${third_party} had provided to talk to the wire invariably wasn't. If you were running more than one network protocol this was a "must have" solution as the alternative was a teetering pile of shims on one of the aforementioned shite monoliths and a "one down, all down" effect.
[1] In this particular case, I have to suspect that Novell's TCP/IP implementation might have been a better call.
I think the blame ought to go to the browser lads for making their products go: "OMFG IS END OF WORLD PANIC PANIC PANIC PANIC" on sight of anything going on over plain old HTTP (even admin shit on your internal LAN), forcing Netgear and their ilk to play silly buggers to get around it.
It's either that or go batshit insane listening to Joe Public wingeing at them '"cos Crom sez iz danger and Crom is right 'cos Google haz kitten pix.".
Well, there are two competing fast charge "standards". Qualcomm's Fast Charge and Oppo's VOOC. The first is more widely adopted in devices, the second kicks its arse royally. The chargers are incompatible, as the first just stuffs a massive current into the battery (brute force and ignorance) whereas the second uses variable potential difference and parallel cell charging (elegant and builds on many years of known working and reliable tech).
My guess would be that the ever-useless fonctionnaires of the EU will choose a third to avoid having to make an actual decision.
This will stifle innovation, but is teh enviromunt yes and is have to be do sumfing.
...given that the travelex is probably THE story...
Strawman argument. I rather suspect that, outside of specialist technical circles, the level of interest in this peaked at "yeah...…...whatever".
NB: "trending on tw@ter" does not count, as a very small minority of self-selecting people is, by definition, not representative of the population as a whole.
It definitely should be there for the majority of use cases.
You try finding that document written by Fred Blogs about fish sometime last year without it, when your users just dump everything in the same shared store and ignore the naming conventions.
I know that the internet is populated by raving paranoids, but 99 times out of 100 there actually isn't an evil corporate plot as the reason for XYZ.
I recall my phone going off at an inopportune time and being sure I was toast, as it was sure to be noticed I was ratarsed.
Turned out that the on-call bloke at ${site} had had his wife walk out on him that day, had buggered off to the pub at lunchtime and had never returned. He was in a worse state than I was.
We both spoke fluent drunken idiot and resolved the issue in short order, agreeing between us to never let anyone know the unimportant details....
I had to fix something that went titsup for Y2K in the early 90s.
99 months considered "permanent". Not actually so as the purge process has no coding for same, but it is a long time. Most purges operated on calculating the duration in months between start date and now, then comparing same to the specified duration.
One of my colleagues decided to be clever, calculate the end date and compare that to now.....(!)
I'll just point out that the BA I took from Sydney to Heathrow with a touch-and-go in Bangkok took considerably longer than 17 hours.
When you're talking about duration, the flight with the longest single flight leg isn't necessarily the longest overall.
It went into production? You mean there's a Google product that doesn't say "beta" on it?
Google are great believers in large scale beta testing to ensure production versions are thoroughly stable. The fact that the pace of change means no version completes beta before being superseded isn't their problem.
Some years ago, a colleague of mine had his car broken into. He had a fancy stereo with a removable faceplate. The plod were already in attendance, the car park had been done.
He had the faceplate on him in its little box, but they'd smashed a window to get into his glovebox ("most people put them there sir"). Then they'd crowbarred open the boot ("that's where everyone else leaves them sir").
The cost of fixing the damage to the rear of the car was waaaayyyy more than a new stereo.
The water tank for the building's fire suppression system is bad enough. When a seam splits on that you really know about it.
Also there's nothing like claiming for flood damage on the 1st floor to make an insurance company start asking difficult questions.
...and of course the little punched-out circles gradually accumulating in a plastic bag.
Come the hot weather, empty the results into the fresh air intake of the boss's car. When he starts it and the climate control goes into overdrive, presto! Instant snow globe.[1]
There are other uses[2] but that was funniest.
[1] Handily, when punched tape was around, pollen filters weren't.
[2] Someone I know tipped a whole black dustbin liner full over the balcony in an old skool cinema during a playing of "The Rocky Horror Picture Show". The air didn't clear before the film finished.
My award goes to the IBM System 38. When using the console on the machine itself, any pause for thought inevitably results in the operator leaning on the thing with hands on the raised sections either side of the keyboard. Look at any '38 and you'll see two patches worn down to the metal in the appropriate places.
In this position, the fingers of your right hand inevitably find their way into a perfectly placed recess on the side of the machine. This in turn prompts you to idly investigate said recess while you're busy thinking about something else. This action inevitably results in a click and the machine running its shutdown cycle.
It's worse than that. The UK courts have a long history of awarding libel damages for publishing stuff that is, er, true.
Anyone touting the UK's legal system as the way libel should be handled is a prize berk of the highest order, as here it really is all about who's got the most cash to spend on lawyers. The finest libel verdicts that money can buy.
in early machines
The As/400IBM i series still does it and it's inherent in EBCDIC[1] systems. I also used to think it was an "old" thing, until I found out that INFORMIX stores its decimal data types the same way.
Subsequent investigation showed that this is still a common storage method where fixed numeric precision is critical. That's pretty much anywhere where the numbers represent money.
[1] Extended Binary Coded Decimal Interchange Code
The key there is "held accountable".
You try getting a print published journal in a different jurisdiction to print your shit with your identity disguised.
Also, if you are the Daily Mail or Gruaniad, you try mobilising public opinion in support of not disclosing some rabble-rousing fuck's identity when presented with a court order. For some reason[1] the web lads seem to have this sewn up.
[1] The sad fact that "web freedom" activism is the exclusive province of blinkered, childish twats has to be top of the list.