Re: Blimey!
I see a highly profitable trade smuggling illegal "AAA"s and coin cells into Australia in the making.
9436 publicly visible posts • joined 5 Oct 2007
Never mind that, the bloody government obviously doesn't know.
Where's the unctuous PR from the Home Office celebrating Data Protection Day and taking the oppportunity to remind us of the sterling work they're doing with ID cards to "protect our data"?
Lazy, good for nothing bastards ruining a perfectly good slagging off opportunity round here....
I can explain that. You've just stumbled on the fundamental purpose of Tesco, which is to keep the riff-raff out of Waitrose.
I saw some bugger turn up at Waitrose the other day without a tie and they let him in! I don't know what the world's coming to......declining standards......moral turpitude......think of the children.....write to the Daily Mail.......etc ad infinitum.
Of those 87 people you'll be looking for the one who stopped, knelt down, very carefully placed the IED with its shaped charge and penetrator pointed in the right direction*, rigged its tripwire/trigger pad, armed it** and then carefully covered it up to prevent its intended victims** going "oh look, there's an IED lying on the ground over there".
*Important bit.
**Who have a vested interest in keeping a very sharp eye out for such things.
It turns out that the other day I bought a shiny new wireless sharing device that had a free* printer, scanner and card reader thrown in and still had a spare USB port to add storage to.
It said "Wireless enabled Multifunction Printer" on the box, but who am I to argue?
*bar a few quid.
Some time back when this Global Warming stuff first became seriously trendy, I followed a link to the Carbon Trust website.
Amongst all the doom 'n gloom, facts, figures 'n such was an article on a low carbon future from some environmental futurist type. Billed as something like an idealistic utopia of teleworking and better public transport, it turned out to be a vision of some pseudo Iron-Age agrarian hell.
I decided at that point that a warmer climate was the better option. Up to your knees in water or up to your knees in horseshit? I'll paddle thanks.
Hmm, I can't find the article there now. I wonder why?
"...Although the executive didn't follow a link embedded in the message...".
There are two possibilities here. First, he's hideously overqualified for the job as he's obviously not only read all the warnings and understood them but also understood that they apply to him. Second (and most likely), he was the one who clicked on the "pwn me nows" email link last time their network got the shaft and remembers the subsequent cattle prod to the goolies he got from their BOFH for doing so.
A fine and absolutely correct answer. It makes no difference which car you own when you approach a toll booth. However, the nice warm feeling you're getting from owning a new car may just serve to take the edge off the anger you feel when you find the bloody toll's gone up.
In other words: "Yes, we own your sorry arse.* Try some retail therapy, you may feel better about it."
I wonder if that's what he meant?
*A spokesman for a more evil company might laugh out loud here. But not Google, oh no. This should be read as delivered in a sympathetic and sincere tone.
There are a few companies out there with 'leccy vehicles already in production.
They've done all the design and preproduction work, have got the product to market and have invested considerable sums to get to this point, sums that should be recouped by sales over the vehicle's life. I'm sure they'll all be delighted at some other company dictating a "standard" replacement system, rendering their current product(s) instantly obsolete at a stroke.
Let's face it. Any manufacturer who this description fits has been placed in a "sue or go bust" position and I think they'll sue.
The ultimate winner here will not be dictated by the browser makers or even the standards bodies, it'll be what the majority of content is served in. Here are two possible scenarios.
1) The content owners look at what's going on and say: "Gosh, Mozilla are absolutely right, we'll transcode everything to OGG immediately, hold two copies of everything for now and look to ceasing support for H.264 in the future. How wrong we were and we're only too happy to spend the time, effort and additional storage in doing this. We apologise."
2) The content owners look at what's going on and say: "Dear Mozilla. Fuck off."
Now, which one do you think is more likely?
Er, no it isn't, the Mythbusters did this one a while ago.
Car full of petroleum products go Boom, huge and very impressive fireball leaving scorched car with all the windows blown out. The energy release is insufficiently concentrated in time to disrupt a steel structure.
Car with a fairly significant amount of HE in it go Boom, massive blast and shockwave, no fireball and nothing left but small bits embedded in the local scenery over a fairly large area.
The conclusion was that if you want to turn a car into flying shrapnel you need real explosives.
So they found that having a child was indeed possible without resorting to IVF or adoption through the simple expedient of shagging on the right day, as identified by this iPhone app.
I have a far simpler solution and it's a bloody sight more fun than an iPhone too.
Shag every day......
Both barrels even.
I'll bet that Apple's response to this will be to scan all apps on or submitted to the App Store for embedded Flurry code and ban all that have it.
Having said that, the idea of Apple banning apps for sound commercial reasons that we can all understand is a bit odd though.
"Au Yeung's victim has now left the modelling industry..."
Odd, she appears to have had all the right qualifications. Young, attractive (presumably), thick as two short ones and a proven willingness to shag her way to the top.
Hmm, maybe she's been offered a Hollywood contract?
Nobody would ever think of ripping a sleeve off to serve as a makeshift bandage on their own. It humbles me to think that, had it been me, I'd have bled to death through lack of an iPhone and a crummy app.
Then again I suppose I might just have remembered the odd scene or several from war films, action movies, medical dramas (etc. ad infinitum) involving bandaging wounds, while I was lying there with nothing else to do but come up with a way of stopping myself dying.
After a series of unpleasant backup / recovery moments, I was invited to a service review meeting to which representitives of the backup team were also invited. They proudly announced that due to their diligent and Herculean efforts they'd managed to raise backup success to 96%.
As several of their high-profile failures had dumped on me, I decided to take my revenge* by innocently asking how many of those "successful" backups could actually be restored. They finally admitted, after many attempts to waffle around the issue, that testing such was, er, on the to-do list.
They were the offal in the sharkpool of service management.
*Ice-cold it was too. Yummy.
I've had one dentist, just one, who knew how to stick a syringeful of jollop into a gum in such a way as to completely and utterly deaden the desired work site without affecting anything else at all.
I should never have moved away. When it comes to "location, location, location" having painless and drool free dentistry within easy walking distance trumps everything else IMHO.
"....Such drilling often requires a local anaesthetic....."
"Often"? Years ago maybe. These days the sadist^H^H^H^H^H^Hdentist usually reaches for the huge* needle before even thinking about touching a drill. I've not heard one offer anaesthesia as an optional item for some time now.
*Objectively speaking it's fairly small in the hypodermic scheme of things. Subjectively it feels like something** more suitable for dishorsing French Knights at range.
**And a rusty, blunt something at that.
I've noticed quite a few "text a registration to this number and we'll tell you all about the car it's stuck on" services being punted recently.
Hmm, make, model and year from a registration number? I wonder where that information comes from (originally)?
Apparently "I run a premium rate text message service and I want to make some cash" is "reasonable cause" these days.