Re: "targeted synergies."
Yup. Untargeted synergies just float around synergising stuff at random.
There you are, just getting a coffee and bam, you're synergised. Doesn't bear thinking about.
9660 publicly visible posts • joined 5 Oct 2007
It also had the advantage of turning up, with the updated Outlook, just as Netscape released its all-singing, all-dancing, all-steaming-turd Communicator package.
I remember saying at the time that if you were asked to guess which was the product of the bloated corporate monolith and which that of the disruptive third party, you'd be wrong.
Moving from Netscape Communicator to IE / Outlook at the time was like getting double the amount of RAM and a liquid helium overclocking job on the CPU.
So it came to pass that demon spake unto the darkness in the world the mystic incantation of 1, 719518.
And Lo, it came to pass that the details of all the faithful could be seen by one and all.
And many were sore vexed by this.
And there was much weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth.
And one spake out into the tumult; "Can it not be made that our information be made secret by means of an application update before he of the world and also his dog be aware of them?"
And a great voice replied; "Fear not, for those who seek to exploit My faithful shall suffer My wrath and the full vengeance of The Lord shall fall upon them!"
And the faithful saw that all was good and that the evildoers would be punished.
Vulnerabilities 8:14
And this is why you should never let politicians or public servants get involved with regulating anything technical.
None of them have the slightest clue what it is, what it does or how it works, so any rules they come up with are inevitably going to be a pile of steaming cobblers interpreted and implemented by retarded fascists.
Apparently the module has at its base the docking port that the automated Progress supply craft docks at.
This docking happens with a bit of a thump. For some reason[1], the repeated thumping causes the structure to crack.
[1] Utterly shit design, cheaping out on reinforcement / damping at the docking port looks favourite.
Over the years I have seen many attempts to run systems where those responsible for looking after them do not have access to large chunks of them.
One thing they all had in common was they didn't work for long and when the wheels came off, the time to fix was astronomical due to the overhead of getting someone with both the balls and authority to drive a coach and horses through someone else's security policy.
I'd be inclined to give them some stick over this, were it not for the fact that every other bastard on the planet is utterly crap at providing consistent UI scaling and MS are probably one of the best of an awfully bad bunch here.
In this case, at least they actually give a shit and have committed to fixing it.
Also in this case, at least the "Accept" or "Continue" button isn't off screen a theoretical eight monitors away with scrolling disabled, as is more usually the case.
One day, outdoors having a cigarette with a Data Centre manager in SE Asia who'd just given us "the tour" and whom I knew from working together elsewhere, I asked about the hot and cold aisles:
"So, how much space is running warmer?"
"XYZ square metres".
"How much money does that save?"
"More than you'd think, x thousand dollars a month! TPTB are very impressed."
"What's the total size of the building?"
"XXXXYYYYYYZZZZZZ square metres."
"Right. Given how you've just had to get a lad with a screwdriver to tweak the thermostat to stop us all freezing our balls off in the meeting room, how much would, say, two degrees on the entire building save?"
He left at Warp 10 to do some maths and get more lads with screwdrivers on the case.
...a centralised IT operation noticed that not all the entities they served celebrated Christmas and not all their staff did either. So, win-win, get a head start on the end of the year and look like they're respecting other cultures too.
Snag: As things inevitably ground to a halt as little things went wrong in various systems, getting any sensible answers out of the software and hardware support people became ever more difficult as the festive period wore on.
...chose carbon cloth....due to commercial availability.
So you went with the cheaper option and it didn't work. You validated this decision by asking an AI and it, remarkably unsurprisingly, told you exactly what you wanted to hear, bending the truth to make it the right answer.
I'll bet the prompts you used included guesstimated pricing and heavily hinted that cost was a primary consideration.
TL;DR - You asked a silly question and got a silly answer.
The Peking Homunculus. How apt.
When the then UK Gold reran Dr Who series to binge on Saturday morning, the continuity announcer introduced it as; "And now Dr Who. This week's series is The Ta..... hell... nobody ever calls it that... The One With The Giant Rat".
If you hold anything at all with a supplier, third-party or escrow service then if presented with a court order for same that entity will hand it over, whether you want them to or not, as they are legally obliged to do so if they are within jurisdiction.
Yes, this does include anything you put in "the cloud".
Take those tinfoil hats off and put them away now.
Unless you can prove that the person responsible both knew of the vulnerability exploited in their systems beforehand and did nothing about it, then they are by definition not guilty of anything.
You cannot hold someone accountable for the illegal actions of a third party.
Now. If you'd suggested that western intelligence agencies should be given a free hand in tracking down those responsible and ensuring that they never trouble anyone, anywhere ever again, I'd be right with you.
These Grok-generated Category C images are then fed into different AI tools to create the most serious Category A videos.
Sounds to me like there are other AIs that are actually responsible for the bit that really breaks the rules and thus should be the primary targets of any action. Probably out of jurisdiction though, hence the focus on grok.
Had the opposite problem once.
Cabled a place that had a very fussy and self-important manager who had one of those "fishbowl" offices with blinds built into the glazed units.
On completion, he pointed out that there was supposed to be a network port in his office, despite his not having a machine.
"Yes. There it is." says I, pointing at it.
"Don't give me that, it's not connected."
"Yes it is. If you like we can get something to plug in to prove it!".
"Look, I can clearly see that there's no cable running to it. I'm not being taken in by any tricks like that.".
"Ah, right. If you look at your glazed wall units here, you can see a recessed joint between each. This one appears is flush instead, which is where the mini trunking runs down from the ceiling with the cable in it.".
He studied this for a minute: "Yeees, I see now. That's invisible, unless you know what you're looking for. Right then, that's everything.".
With the benefit of hindsight, we should have asked for more money for "invisible" installations.