Re: Golden opportunity
"the day that a human body is not an offensive, unacceptable thing." — little chance once the AI overlords have the upper hand.
In any case utterly impossible the US as that excuse for a nation ceaselessly strives for a global monopoly of hypocrisy. [Hypocracy - rule by hypocrisy ? ]
While anything even vaguely touching on Musk's interests ought to be condemned out of hand, I am a bit puzzled about the details. I don't have any actually experience of these AI "disrobing apps", but I would be surprised if these apps produce an accurate representation of the subjects body; at least from a single image.
Thanks to the "miracle" of the internet the availability of unclad images illustrates the enormous variety of human anatomy. An interesting experiment might be be to take the initially clothed images from the likes of Prontube†; have grok et al. disrobe it; compare the result with an unclad and presumably later frame of the subject.
I was thinking that an unclothed child would be of little interest to all except the paedophile minority until I realised that "child" in the US means anyone under 18 years without distinction between the youngest and eldest.
The production, possession or dissemination of any depiction of child exploitation whether computer generated, hand crafted or photographic is a serious offence in most jurisdictions. Posting to social media of even inaccurate images of unclothed children would likely constitute such an offence.
Ultimately taking an image of another person and without their consent modifying it, certainly demonstrates a lamentable lack of respect; sharing or publishing such a modified image is fairly clearly an invasion of the subject's privacy. The question might be posed: "How would you feel if your 14 year old daughter's image were so treated ?"
† taking the internet's "killer app" generically.