Re: Why do you need a NEW digital (same) currency?
Belgium has Banccontact... So, I'm at a loss what EU means with this new scheme.
42 publicly visible posts • joined 30 Oct 2024
I think this paragraph has the answer:
"Privacy advocates argue that every digital transaction creates records, so it could be possible to track a consumer’s use of a CBDC."
"Track a consumers use of CBDC" is the reason why "they" are telling us that "we" need a digital currency.
The idea that EU self-sufficiency requires tolerating abusive licensing practices is not only misguided; it’s dangerous.
True sovereignty in tech doesn’t come from shielding dominant players from scrutiny; it comes from fostering fair, transparent, and competitive ecosystems. If SAP’s licensing model is exploitative or obstructive, then addressing that isn’t “hamstringing success", it’s laying the groundwork for sustainable innovation.
Moreover, framing regulatory oversight as a threat to self-sufficiency ignores the fact that unchecked monopolistic behavior is precisely what undermines resilience. The EU’s goal shouldn’t be to protect its prominent tech firm blindly, but to ensure that its success doesn’t come at the cost of user rights, interoperability, or market fairness.
Tick boxes aren’t the problem; abuse disguised as strategic necessity is. Common sense means recognizing that long-term strength comes from principled governance, not from enabling the very practices that stifle competition and lock in dependency.
I’m still astounded by how quickly people tend to blame the victim instead of the perpetrator. This issue is not with the customers, but entirely with Bose. I genuinely hope that this decision will have lasting repercussions for them.
It’s unreasonable to expect people to be knowledgeable about the concept of “cloud,” how it’s integrated into the products they paid a couple of thousand dollars for, and its future evolution. When you purchase a product, you don’t expect to be an expert in its workings. They’re buying an appliance, not a complex puzzle.
Perspective is everything.
When you receive an email from a supposed lawyer in the UK claiming that a distant relative in Nigeria left you millions, your instinct is to report it as fraud. But when a similar message comes from a tech giant like Meta, it suddenly becomes headline news on The Register.
We’re spending tens of millions annually on technologies that—so far—seem primarily designed to automate accountability and eliminate jobs.
...I wouldn't trust the safety of my team and operations to a company that wouldn't recognize data security if it hit them in the face. But that's just my opinion.
I suppose the next generation of partisan warfare might involve using bots to post fake enemy locations on Meta VR systems, luring soldiers together while they wear their goggles, making them easy targets.
Sorry, I have difficulties understanding the problem. I just installed Ubuntu on a HP Spectre X360. I use Tidal, Spotify, LibreOffice, NovelWrite, Evernote, Firefox, Chrome, Edge, Vivaldi, Brave, Opera, Dropbox, Gdrive sync, and a bunch of other apps which have alternatives on Windows.
I access my data through SFTP via the file browser like a local disk. That isn't really stable on Windows.
I connect my portable DAC, the equalizer recognizes the device and automatically sends the audio to the right channel. I set the US keyboard on a French laptop as default and it stays like that. For the last 20 years, Windows hasn't been able to get that right.
The only thing that needs some babysitting is display calibration, as DisplayCAL is picky about the hardware. But, as far as a "productivity laptop" goes, it just does what it's supposed to do.
Straightforward stuff works out of the box. The fiddling starts when you try to make a Windows-centric thing work in Linux without a decent driver.
What specifically doesn't work?
Listen, this is just complaining for the sake of it.
If you want an alternative, accept its specificities. If you don't want to bother and prefer a sandbox where companies decide what you need, then use that. There is something for everyone. Let's stop complaining and trying to be different by being like everyone else.
And with a cascading procedure of interacting with the data.
On a sidenote: I wonder if we should consider the idea of a databank, which would serve as a safe storage and exchange system for data, similar to how a bank safeguards money.
Unlike money, people often don't hesitate to trust their data to various companies, even though it's frequently mishandled.
There are many instances of "maybe," "probably," "unable to verify," "another possibility is," and "could be" throughout this article, which in essence talks about nothing. Despite substantial events occurring around the world, someone at The Register still managed to fill a whole article with speculation.
People don't want these to participate, because
Google = they're the enshittification overlords
Red Hat has a very opinionated development style that doesn't favor customizability, they don't seem to care about the average Linux user, and they killed CentOS.
In general, there are no factual reasons to prevent them from contributing, but there are plenty of emotional ones. :-)