"required little more than a headwind and a flask of tea to take off."
Don't forget the rather nice moustache that the RAF chaps are fond of.
67 publicly visible posts • joined 29 Oct 2024
Was the article much of an advert?
You have valid points on the technical front that this could be done using basic failover and other technologies.
But I didn't find the article ad like and pushing a particular product, merely the author saying they already had a Unifi DM so used that.
If they said they went out and bought the Unifi kit specifically for this reason because other, cheaper kit didn't support it, I would support your statement. But as they didn't, I just don't see it.
I'm far from a Starmer fan just to be clear, but standing up to Trump and not blindly going to war with him is probably the only good example here.
On the other hand the defensive planning for that same war (lack of ships in the Med, lack of a variety of other equipment too) was a massive own goal.
Well based on the linked Wiki page prices, $995m per launch x 13 launches is just shy of $13bn.
That leaves close to $20bn in R&D costs for the program, which as it has already flown you could assume R&D this time around would be significantly less.
You could have the same argument about any American return to the moon regardless of what hardware its flying on so what difference would it make?
Still running multiple instances of NetScaler (formerly Citrix ADC) here in production, for both external and internal facing applications.
We also use Citrix App and Desktop Virtualization in both on-prem and SaaS hybrid deployments.
I've never been a big fan but don't have the internal sway to move away.
Speculation with absolutely no backing by people like you sitting on forums.
The BBC is going to be putting "select" new shows targeted at a younger audience, you seem to have some warped that into all new content will be going onto Youtube and iPlayer will be closing of which there is not a single element of truth in.
Content is duplicated on multiple platforms around the globe for many reasons, not just from the BBC.
And there is a clear distinction with regards to the TV license that it specifically applies to iPlayer. For the same reason you don't need a license to watch content the BBC upload to their social media feeds (Instagram, TikTok etc)
Sadly you seem to be of the anti-establishment, four-chan type of which there is no way to have a friendly debate with because you just spout conspiracy theories and crap that has no backing or evidence. Are you a X user by any chance?
"There's also some other oddities coming, like scrapping iPlayer and moving its online content to YouTube"
Found no evidence to support this so you're twisting what is actually happening.
The BBC has announced it is introducing some new shows first onto YouTube followed by iPlayer and Sounds in an attempt to reach a younger audience. At no stage has it been mentioned they'll be scrapping iPlayer in any way sense or form.
People like you just like posting off fake news.
Sadly it might well end up being a slippery slope and it'll be interrupting game play before you know it.
That was just one example in another there was a man down for injury, normally you'd be getting commentary of what is going on. Instead the window shrunk to about quarter of the size so you couldn't see it, and the audio was replaced with some crap from Virgin Atlantic if I recall correctly, along with their ad being shown.
It's just another thing to ruin the viewing experience. Before long it'll be available on ITVX without ads for those that want to pay.
Advertising is an important part of broadcasting, I get that, it's how these broadcasters (excluding BBC) fund their operations despite my hatred of them. And I'm pro-capitalism as well so I fully understand.
But broadcasting, along with capitalism, should have lines that don't get crossed and better regulation to enforce it.
For the viewer yes, I fucking despise adverts.
Take the Six Nations for example that I mentioned. Yes odd mention of a podcast and follow ups on the BBC televised games.
Those cunts over at ITV have now taken to putting adverts on during the game, removing commentary and splitting the screen, example here: https://www.gbnews.com/media-library/itv-came-under-fire-for-showing-adverts-during-the-six-nations-match-between-france-and-ireland.jpg?id=63854905&width=800&quality=85
Who signed off on that deserves to be fired in my opinion.
I must be one of the few under 70s who doesn't mind paying the TV license.
Just this week I used TV to watch the Six Nations, radio to listen to it, my kids watched CBeebies/CBBC content live and on iPlayer, and I spent time reading the news.
£15/month for that doesn't seem much to me, and is better than it getting filled with adverts.
Of course if you don't use any of their output but want to watch live TV still, I can understand the frustration.
I can see it just coming under general taxation before this decade is out.
I think the old add on will continue to work fine, and PowerShell is simply to enable it, its two fucking commands to run you're not writing an entire PS script from scratch.
Also comparing PS to AI is insane. Like so insane I think AI might well have written it.
I believe Enterprise LTSC is a separate license key to even Windows 10 Enterprise Non-LTSC.
In theory this would be possible to install on an machine already running Win 10 Home by doing a clean installer and forcing it to use Enterprise LTSC version. However, you would need to ensure you had the correct license key/agreement to use it.
"Most Macs will never run anything but their original copy of macOS."
This seems wrong, as there is a new macOS release every year and has been since 2011.
And most new Macs will get a minimum of 4 or 5 years worth of updates, meaning they'll be several copies in before dropping support.
Unless it was meant to imply that a "fresh/clean" install will never be done?
I really would love to know what he is doing with these phones to break the charging ports on them.
I've had several iPhones since the 4 (keep the booing down) and various Android phones too, mainly as work devices, and never had any charging ports fail.
In fact only device I've had recently with a charging port failure is an iPad Pro 3rd-Gen where its a known fault. Still charges using USB-A to USB-C cable, slowly, but USB-C to USB-C, nada
Can't fault Volvo to be fair, I have a 10 year old XC90 with Sensus and it still gets map updates OTA (well, need to connect it to phone hotspot) for no charge.
By contrast our other car, a 2017 Vauxhall/Opel had one year of map updates made available (we didn't pay as it was £80ish) before being abandoned by GM.
Also highly recommend Syn3 Updater (https://cyanlabs.net/applications/syn3updater/) for Ford cars with Sync 3 but pre-2020/21 as it gives them the latest software and maps too (although not as seamless as vendor OTA)
Did he though?
The article states he bought it from "a major brick-and-mortar retailer" which tends to suggest its a large, reputable company.
If he bought it from eBay, Facebook Marketplace or some other random site online, I'd totally understand that it could be viewed as his fault.
But when you physically visit a large chain retailer, not sure what else you expect him to have done?
Not that you were looking at her rear end at all to see this.....
Yeah nothing here mentions Apple who as others have said, don't have a folding device. Well, unless a Macbook is included as that does technically fold.
These days with phone theft in the capital a bigger sign would be having it in your hand unlocked so the thieves can get at your data and personal information.