I'm no expert but...
It seems to me that it might be more efficient to spend the money on actual production.
153 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Jul 2024
AI glasses would be fine if they were produced by an ethical company that was only interested in making a fair profit per pair while helping people. They would have no motivation to enable nudification and facial recognition. They'd help people see the world. That's sort of the caricature that comes to mind when people talk about the virtues of capitalism.
Of course, investor capitalism will never stand for this sort of company, because it's desire for a fair profit per glasses would not provide an avenue for explosive company growth, fueling increasing stock process. Meta actually likes the negative publicity about their glasses. It helps their stock prices. The combination of smart glasses + tech bro AI company + social media is the problem.
I suppose that all those people who use CoPilot to "clean up" their documents are going to be helping this worm along. I wonder how long it will be before the worm is piggy backing on Excel. Maybe Microsoft should revisit it's decision adopt an opt-out policy instead of an opt-in policy when it comes to AI.
Protecting kids from harmful content by keeping them off harmful sites is just not working. A more effective approach would be to make sites financially liable for the harm they do. This would probably reduce the amount of porn and pedophilia on the Internet, but I can live with that.
In the 16 hundreds, a rich, and often "noble" Europeans decided that capturing Africans and selling them as slaves in the Western Hemisphere was a good thing because Africans were relatively immune to malaria. Using Black slaves in the Caribbean would enable commerce so they thought it a good and inevitable thing.
AI can be used by the ultra-rich to avoid using the labor of the non-rich. The ultra-rich think this is a good and inevitable thing.
Microsoft, Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, and NVidia, have all be spewing this SF non-sense. They say they will be using mini-nukes to power their data centers. They say they will be turning Three Mile Island back on. The say that heat is no problem, governments (not them) just need to use the heat effectively in a way that is plausible but not something they are attempting to do themselves.
It all smells a bit like the carbon capture marketing bit they were doing earlier to green wash there operations.
"Windows needs to be faster, more reliable, and contain a more targeted deployment of AI." Windows needs a single kill switch in the settings application that kills all AI, including AI in apps. When I say apps, I include apps like Chrome and Acrobat. These windows apps should be required to obey the kill switch.
According to an article in the NY Times
"During the presidential campaign, Donald J. Trump gathered oil executives at his Mar-a-Lago estate and promised them a powerful return on their investment if they raised $1 billion to help him retake the White House."
It also explains the Iranian war, along with he just generally does what Netanyahu tells him to do.
My wife had to get another laptop and I needed to install the software for our Brother printer/scanner (She was used to their scanning program). While installing the software for the printer (for which we already have an ink subscription) I was up sold for 4 different products while waiting to install the some Windows utilities.
I guess once a software vendor has your attention they don't want to let you go.
I have a modest proposal. Why doesn't Microsoft sell a "classic version with no AI" of all their software for a bit more money than the AI offering. Let's face it, this is a total Microsoft move, so why not go for it guys. You can still go on ruining the environment with AI products that nobody wants AND make a little money on the side. And let's face it, no one wants to buy you AI offering so why not just to the MS thing?
It seems to me that it is entirely true that age verification technology will end anonymity on the Internet. It also seems to me that the Internet is largely toxic to children. It also seems to me that the technology used to just guess at a users age using AI will, in the long run, invade user privacy just as much as the direct loss of anonymity. Even the heavy handed "let's just not allow toxic content on the Internet" will definitely result in a loss of free speech.
I once new a really good programmer who would sit round, apparently doing nothing for months. He would then type for a couple of weeks an a program would emerge that was brilliant. I asked him what his trick was and he said, "I sit around thinking about the problem a lot.". Our bosses were frustrated with this behavior. From their perspective, if he had been typing the entire time they would have even more genius code.
AI enables a new generation of developers to avoid thinking about the problem. It enables a new generation of bosses to press for more speed - and then whine about the lack of quality later.
I am sure that many of you, like me, in an effort to get away from Copilot, have switch to other git providers like codeberg.org. Even so, if you still have a github.com account I suggest that you log in to github and follow the instructions to disable Copilot completely - or as completely as Microsoft will allow. This will register every so slightly on the Microsoft corporate "brain" that people don't like Copilot and it is an foolish business venture. At least we can hope.