Re: If power and infra are the true bottlenecks
Quite so. However this statement - the west thinks 1-4 quarters requires a deeper look.
Firstly, financial returns of some sort over the next 1-4 quarters are indeed actually important, anywhere in the world, but those returns are increasingly derived from changes in stock prices and are increasingly speculative. There is a reasonable argument that this is a good thing in that the stock purchases are like long term loans that appreciate as the company gets closer to the date when profitability is achieved and the stocks start paying dividends. I.e., it enables looking 10 years ahead.
However a closer look reveals that the long term net rise in the stock market has been assisted by repeated government intervention (fiddling with bonds, reserve requirements, QE, psuedo-QE) and the rise of ETFs, which makes the whole thing too big to fail. There is a reasonable argument that this is a bad thing, because it is the antithesis of capitalism that keeps the beast alive with government life support, and has enabled monopolies or generally the largest players, K-street lobbyists, and the financial industry (now conjoined with bitcoin) to thrive at the expense of smaller businesses. It has also kept the dollar high, encouraging outsourcing, and hurting manufacturing exports - which have proven to be problematic.
So what does this have to with rapid expansion of Datacenters and online computing power? There is an argument that this is a modern form of manufacturing - making tokens - which is a form of productivity. This argument goes that this can be the US' answer to China's 50 years of government subsided physical exports and domination of manufacturing. In 50 years the world will rely on (exponentially closer to) "AGI" tokens the same way that the US now relies on Chinese manufactured goods. Except that it won't be US government supported but supported by justified speculative stock prices.
I've run out of time but that just won't work.