Naive and/or stupid. I'm not sure how anyone could not be aware that there are some seriously fierce laws against unauthorised data access that it's better not to mess with.
Posts by JimBz
19 publicly visible posts • joined 8 Jul 2024
Dutch cops arrest man after sending him confidential files by mistake
X sues to protect Twitter brand Musk has been trying to kill
AI datacenter boom could end badly, Goldman Sachs warns
Amazon complains that Perplexity's agentic shopping bot is a terrible customer
AWS admits more bits of its cloud broke as it recovered from DynamoDB debacle
Microsoft admits it 'cannot guarantee' data sovereignty
The AIpocalypse is here for websites as search referrals plunge
Re: Some of hese comments seem to miss the point
Never seen an AI answer that was correct? Really? It's not always perfect, but it's often enough or at least a good start for my kind of query.
I totally prefer AI answers over a list of promoted sites and optimised ad bucket sites. Google didn't put AI at the top because it wants to give you AI answers to demonstrate how wonderful its AI is or something, it did it to stop a migration to alternate AI answer sites. It's a loss of revenue but that's better than a total loss of relevance. Goggle want to remain the default search engine.
There's plenty of problems with AI, and we are in the early days when everything changes every other week, but this is better for me at least.
Cops want Apple, Google to kill stolen phones remotely – so why won't they?
Turns out using 100% of your AI brain all the time isn’t most efficient way to run a model
VPN Secure parent company CEO explains why he had to axe thousands of 'lifetime' deals
I'm all for suing the company, if it works. I don't know anything about the legal merit of this case, but I'd guess it probably won't work. And if even it does, it probably won't hit the scammers who made the original offer.
But generally, if a deal is too good to be true, it's too good to be true. We're absolute suckers for the free lunch and it creates one crazy situation after another. Personally, I'd tend go for the best sustainable deal in this situation, but there's also the let's-see-how-long-we-can-milk-this-cow approach if that floats your boat. But imaging that the unsustainable will continue forever "because advertising" is just nuts. Believing your own dummy spit just keeps the circus going.
There's a great adage in economics: If a trend is unsustainable, it won't continue forever. Corollary: It may continue for longer than you can afford to bet against it.
Three Brits charged over 'active shooter threats' swattings in US, Canada
Google says it's rolling out fix for stricken Chromecasts
Google Timeline location purge causes collateral damage
Re: Faster than a speeding bullet
Any big dataset has errors but that doesn't make it useless. We take into account context, corroboration, reasonableness. If there's a murder down the road and your timeline says you were there you are in serious need of a reliable alibi. Your location blips probably won't do the trick. If the murder was in South America, and you had to travel at the speed of light to get there and return, you're off the hook.
Smile! UK cops spend tens of millions on live facial recognition tech
D-Link tells users to trash old VPN routers over bug too dangerous to identify
NASA wants ideas on how to haul injured moonwalkers
Cisco scores a perfect CVSS 10 with critical flaw in its wireless system
Speed limiters arrive for all new cars in the European Union
Re: Good
That's good and reasonable, but people are mentally different and have different capabilities. A government would be voted out if it only licenced drivers who meet your level. A bit of a capability augmentation is ok. How do you feel about ABS? Lane keeping and vehicle distance monitoring? Ideally, we all be ideal drivers, reality is messy.