Re: re: sufficient reason to kill someone
It's absolute cake to draw the line. Abortion legal until ANY point before birth.
At what point between "waters breaking" and "umbilical cord cut" do you think the line should be drawn?
2622 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Sep 2007
Not really: It's not exact but at around a certain point in a pregnancy, the foetus will have developed enough to meet whatever standard the medical professionals have determined to be an independent life form.
That's an ethical judgement, not a medical one. The track record of medical professionals deciding who has a worthwhile life is not great, and runs on a line through Tiergarten 4 through Tuskagee to the abortion of fetuses with Down's Syndrome and the blanket DNRs issued for autistic people during COVID.
Doctors simply are not trained to make these decisions.
I would be very unhappy for this particular line to be drawn by medics or scientists, because it's an ethical/philosophical line, not a medical/scientific one. Sure, the science will advise, but it's up to society to put an upper limit and for individuals to decide how close to that they personally want to go.
Abortion isn't "killing someone"
At four weeks? Absolutely not killing somewone. At sixteen weeks? Probably not. At twenty four weeks? Getting trickier. After contractions have started (and there are those who call for abortion on demand at any point before birth? Yes, almost certainly killing.
It's a very, very difficult line to draw.
80% of the heat produced is in the form of emitted neutrons. These are not confined with the plasma, for obvious reasons, so they hit the walls, get absorbed and warm them up. Extracting the resulting heat from slabs of metal is left as an exercise for the reader.
See: https://www.iter.org/sci/MakingitWork
I have just discovered that for an extra £2 per month I could upgrade my A&A FTTP deal from 80/20 to 115/20 and it would only cost double what I pay now (ie £75) for 1000/115. But what's the point? I'm getting 56Mbps to my desk over a powerline adaptor as it is, and bandwidth is never an issue for anything I do.
And if they get rid of her, it will be someone worse still. Because every one of them is totally crap. They did, after all,. choose 4 crap leaders in succession. QED.
The elephant in the room is that Tory party has got itself into a state where it can only field a cabinet of Brexiteers (or avowed Brexiteers, like Boris). That already restricts the possible choice of leader to a group of idiots. Let's face it, Liz Truss would be a bit of an embarrassment as a parish councillor.
Sunak was rejected because of his role in undermining the Government ...
Well, if your entire cabinet has been chosen on the basis that they are Johnson loyalists, having one of them point out that he was in fact a lying, self-interested incompetent is probably a bit of a surprise. Of course Rishi Sunak was not the only one, which is even more of a surprise.
Boris Johnson did far, far more to undermine the government than anyone else.
Something these 'quiet quitters' haven't factored in is the long term impact of their refusal to do their job well.
Quiet quitters are not refusing to do their job well. They are simply doing what they are paid do do; (quite literally) no more and no less. That has absolutely nothing to do with their quality of work. I have worked with people who do superb stuff and go home on the dot and I have worked with people who stay till all hours doing a half-arsed job.
In fact I would say that one the whole, people who need to spend some of their own time to get a job done which others can manage wholly in their employers' time are the ones to keep an eye on, and not in a good way.
The costs of working from home are not always enormous, but they can be significant. Budget conscious office workers will probably have there home central heating on from 6 - 8 am (ish) and from 5 - 10pm (ish). That's 7 hours per day; working from home adds another 9 hours and therefore probably doubles heating costs overall.
Of course there are ways to reduce this extra cost, by heating less of the house, and the effect is much less for the sort of idiots (or "Daily Mail reader" as they are known) who claim a God-given right to keep their entire house, including bedrooms, at 24C 24/7.
If by "we", you mean nato, then yeah, most of those wars fought after Vietnam were against vastly inferior people (in terms of their equipment).
Don't forget that the US has lost every single war it has fought since WW2, with the possible exception of the invasion of Grenada. Woop-de-do.
Korea. Lost. Vietnam. Lost. Gulf War 1: Gave up. Gulf War 2: Lost. Afghanistan: Sorry asses whupped. Somalia: ran away.
That is a great argument against the current quota garbage. Racism and sexism have no place when getting the job done.
Well, exactly. Which is which sensible employers fight back against the racist and sexist attitudes which have resulted in unofficial quotas (of 95%+) for white men in technology and engineering.
You've been downvoted for pointing out something which is unquestionably true. Most odd.
On the basic principle that any group including "liberty" in its name is a haven for swivel-eyed loons, it seems likely that "Moms for Liberty" is well and truly wackjob, but there seems to be no evidence whatsoever that they had any role in the ban. If the ban actually exists.
Somebody needs to tell them that. The entire basis of no-platforming campaigns at university is "I/we are intelligent, educated and sensitive enough to hear, analyse and reject some opinions. My/our fellow students, however, are so stupid, ignorant and insensitive that they must not be permitted even to hear opinions of which I/we disapprove."
Rejecting and opposing things is fine. Trying to prevent others from doing so is not, particularly at universities.
I use Xubuntu (on three desktops and two laptops) and the only things which piss me off are those applications which use GNOME's new unusability guidelines. You know the sort of thing: two gearwheel icons top right, one of which is settings and one of which is everything else.
Sorry, are you implying there's an open source project out there that isn't?
Fair point. The GNOME team do seem to have an especially sadistic streak, though. Most OS teams ignore their users ("Who cares what you want?"); the GNOME lot activity despise them ("We know what you want, so here's something completely different. Now fuck off.").
When you give it a run, please do report back on how annoying the forced automatic updates are, and the lack of a button to turn them off.
Are you a Linux user, by any chance? Last time I looked, standard Firefox still allowed control over updates but the Xubuntu (and I presume Ubuntu) version which I use didn't. Apparently that's because the OS team have designated Firefox updates as OS security ones, so they cannot be turned off or even postponed.
That in turn means that Firefox in Xubuntu regularly restarts itself, losing all work in open tabs (which it rarely reopens properly) without any opportunity of a graceful exit or saving.
Screw them. I have moved to Chrome.
But you can't hold a whole bank responsible for the behavior of a few, sick twisted individuals. For if you do, then shouldn't we blame the whole bank system? And if the whole bank system is guilty, then isn't this an indictment of our financial institutions in general? I put it to you, Anonymous Coward - isn't this an indictment of our entire American society? Well, you can do whatever you want to us, but we're not going to sit here and listen to you badmouth the United States of America. Gentlemen!
It's easy with Linux. AltGr+[ a = ä, for example.
The Mac method sounds strangely familiar...
Surface gravity on the sun: 28g (fsvo "surface"
Surface gravity on Jupiter: 2.5g (ditto)
Radius of Jupiter: 70,000 km
Distance from Jupiter to Sun: 740,000,000 km
Gravitational effect of Jupiter at Sun's surface: 2.5 * (70,000/740,000,000)^2 = 0.000000022g
Ditto, as proportion of Sun's own gravitational field: 0.00000008%
Yeah. That'll make a huge difference. Astrology is bollocks.
RJ Palmer, a conceptual artist, told the BBC. "Right now, if an artist wants to copy my style, they might spend a week trying to replicate it. That's one person spending a week to create one thing. ..."
Ah, remember the days when it took longer than a week to train as an artist? Mind you, I've looked at their website, and the claim seems pretty plausible..