Re: Good lord
A degree with "business" in its name is no indication of intelligence. In fact it's precisely the opposite. See also: "studies".
3971 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Sep 2007
The free software people aren't going to all this trouble to create ms compatibility, then stopping 1 inch short of the end just to be <gratuitous sexist slur>
It is not simply a matter of compatibility. Equation editing is not compatible between MS Word and LibreOffice, for whatever reason, but is also far, far better in Word, not least because you can enter LaTeX. Of course LaTeX itself is better still.
Everything done by a government is paid for by the current workers.
So what happens to the income tax I pay on my pension? What happens to the 20% of almost everything I spend which goes to the government as VAT? My pension is deferred wages. Just because I am not working for the money right now does not mean that someone else is working for it any more than someone else is working for you when you're asleep or on holiday.
The other version [of nominalism] specifically denies the existence of abstract objects as such—objects that do not exist in space and time.
Which means that nominalism itself does not exist. "Oh, that was easy," says Man, and for an encore goes on to prove that black is white and gets himself killed on the next zebra crossing.
See also: post-structuralist true believers, who claimed (or claim, if there are any left) that there is no such thing as "meaning" and that Jacques Derrida's books explain this.
The Greens are just a leftie version of Reform: inexperienced leader opening wholly impractical policies to impress a fan base. Their "unlimited immigration" policy is as far as Reform's "no immigration" one.
That's in England and Wales. The Scottish Greens are a wholly owned subsidiary of the SWP, which is why they are middle class, authoritarian and misogynist.
As someone who has been using Mac/Win/Linux for many decades, since Mandrake came free in CDs in magazines
Coo. That brings back memories. Mandrake was the first Linux I ever tried, and it did indeed come free with a magazine. I tried to add it to a computer which was already dual booting OS/2 and Windows (the happy days of chained bootloaders) and its installer scribbled so comprehensively over my MBR that I had to rebuild the entire system.
I posted to uk.comp.os.linux to ask for advice and was instantly told that I was clearly a lying Micro$oft shill, because there was no way Linus could possibly do what I had just seen it do. So it was a good introduction to the Linux community as well as to the OS.
I gave up on Linux then, returning to it some years later with Ubuntu 6.06. which played very nicely with my system, including sharing a JFS volume which was both D: and /home
Want to set up hibernation for your Dell laptop
Hah. My other half has a Dell laptop on which I installed Linux Mint. Even when told not to suspend or hibernate it still does so if the screen is closed, and so completely that it can only be brought back to life by a hard reset. Very impressive.
Back in the 1990s, OS/2 was a better OS than Windows 3.x and 9x, in terms of technical merit. But it didn't matter, because it was starved for applications and hardware driver support.
I finally jumped ship from OS/2 (by then eComStation) in 2006 because when I tried Ubuntu 6.06 it had no problem with either by graphics card (for which I had had to buy an OS/2 driver) or my audio chipset (which had never worked under OS/2).
Having the choice is far, far more important that having Linux or some other Unix variant take over the world.
See also: left wing political parties and the history of the presbyterian church(es) in Scotland. The quest for ideological purity never leads to widespread success. That may be a good thing.
Which OS is easier to install? On reasonably common hardware, it's Linux, by a country mile.
I have only twice recently had to install Windows - Windows 10 on other people's computers. It was an absolute doddle in both cases. A Linux Mint install is significantly more complicated.
I am writing this on a Lenovo desktop attached to a Brother laser printer. Elsewhere I have an identical Lenovo desktop attached to an identical Brother laser printer. Both printers are connected by USB and are also on wifi. This computer will only print over USB. The other one will only print over wifi. Of my two laptops here, one sees the printer but won't print to it; the other can't even see the printer.
And thanks for confirming that yet another Linux audio project hopes to make that side of things work. My point, neatly made.
Users should not have to be tech-literate to use a computer, and more than drivers need to be tech-literate to drive a car or "Dr Who" fans need to be tech-literate to watch the telly. The days when "Newnes Practical Television, by Dictron" was essential reading for anyone with a TV are long gone, bit the Linux world still thinks there is virtue in obscurity.
Want some fun with LibreOffice under Linux Mint? Simply type a few words into a text document, set 'em to 96 point, zoom in a couple of clicks ... and log in again, because your desktop session has just crashed, losing all work from all open apps. LibreOffice devs don't care. x.org devs don't care. XFCE devs don't care. And Linux Mint devs don't care because their answer to everything is "that's an upstream issue, nothing to do with us."
Besides the usual security crap – 41 zero-day CVEs so far in 2025 at the time of writing – there have been new features such as Microsoft Recall, a privacy disaster disguised as a feature. Then there's the way Microsoft is forcing AI functions down our throats.
I run Linux Mint on three desktops and three laptops at the moment. Each one has required about 2GB worth of updates this month alone. My current issue is finding a replacement for Firefox without the spectacularly enshittifying amount of AI which Mozilla think justifies their CEO's salary.
Snap? Fuck right off with that. The whole security philosophy of Linux has been to make use of libraries so that when an issue is discovered, every piece of software using that function is effectively updated in one fell swoop. Use Snap and every single package has its own version of every library and whether these get updated depend on the competence, whim and continued existence of the developers. Storage is cheap; having umpteen potentially insecure versions of libraries is potentially very, very expensive indeed.