Re: OTT
Oh you’re adorable.
21 publicly visible posts • joined 27 Jan 2024
Oh boy the reg comentariat can never just not like anything can they? Where does the hyperbolic whining come from?
It’s not a ‘toy database’. It’s not ‘awful’. You may disagree with some key decisions in it but eeesh… grow up.
And the person who “refuses to work” with MySQL? I’d rather have data integrity issues than have someone like that on my team
Reading that GitHub thread, this is an almost perfect example of how to acknowledge, handle and communicate around a serious issue.
This shouldn’t be a surprise but I’m so used now to deflection, weasel words and excuses, that the clear response and expected timelines are seriously good to see
The joy of missing out is an interesting concept. I like it, but I think I’d find it hard to embrace it.
There’s a real problem in how we’ve done away with gatekeepers, or rather, just added a lot more gatekeepers. None of us trust a single source to curate our news and knowledge for us. In some senses it’s empowering - each and every one can be an independent researcher - but in reality it’s both exhausting and a con: trusting to an algorithm doesn’t actually ensure greater transparency or variety than just reading a newspaper ever did.
As someone who worked in this space for years and years… I’m not surprised. A lot of these orgs just aren’t talking to each other and/or not listening.
We spent a lot of time pushing back against half thought through plans around data sharing and control and were frequently accused of simply being “opposed to joining up healthcare” rather than flagging up concerns that proposals were unworkable.
I am not sad that I do not work in this domain any more.
Interesting piece.
I’m not at all sure that this guy’s approach is going to be a sustainable and widely used one but it’s good to see people attacking the problem from a different angle. There’s way too much groupthink right now - we get bursts of innovation and then just a truckload of people all doing the same thing.