these are consumer SSDs!
based on the capacities, these appear to all be consumer-ish SSDs. enterprise SSDs should have an even better AFR. And bleh on Seagate and WD, their drives suck, as evidenced by the results...
15 publicly visible posts • joined 26 Sep 2007
I know Broadcom is well viewed by investors because Hock Tan is a heartless asshole that demands these kinds of actions, but man, I wish some of these investors would personally understand how ruthless he really is. I was in a company that was acquired by Avago/Broadcom, and during a company-wide all hands meeting, he basically said I bought this company for this division directly, the others either don't have a great roadmap that shows growth, or I'll find an idiot willing to take this other division off my hands. Those of us who were in the divisions he was either going to close or sell off were shocked that he was so apparent and smirking about it. Needless to say, once he found a taker for my division, we were gone and had to be out of the building the day the sale was announced.
Would be hilarious if they spun off the hilariously terrible acquisitions made under Phil Brace's watch. As an ex-Seagate employee that was in the SSD side of things, I'd be surprised if they found a stupor.. errr suitor to take the SSD interests. Xyratex team is all but gone. There's still some StorageTek guys, but its a shell. I just don't see what assets are left to spin out for any real cash compared to their investment.
It does and it doesn't make sense. Hynix was a partner with them on the client drives on the NAND side, but not on the SSD controller side.
For datacenter, the drop-off in performance from Intel's current 4510 offering to Hynix's PE4010 would anger nearly all of Intel's customers.
Not only that but the amount of FW cusomization required for some of their OEM customers is not some Hynix has a good track record with,
I don't agree with how hard it is purported to be to erase a drive (controller dependent) For drives with internal encryption, a secure erase just throws away the encryption keys. Without the encryption keys, the data on the drive is useless. Yeah you can see data, but it is encrypted data that cannot be decrypted. Even client class SSDs ship with this today (SandForce is first that comes to mind).
And yeah, very difficult to recover dead drives. In general if anything in the root area (controller FW / LBA map, etc) becomes corrupted, especially near the end of the life of the drive, then it is toast. In most cases if your primary root record is toast, your secondary (backup) root record is gone too. Its really a matter of the controller croaking rather than the flash as you mentioned. But also when/if a drive enters read-only mode Windows will blue screen because windows likes to write to disks.... and if writes are ignored, windows no likey... either completes boot if this is a secondary drive and doesnt recognize the drive anymore, OR if this is primary, you're duped into believe you can't use the drive anymore.
TLC today (non-samsung) is about 300-500 PE cycles. Thats 1/10th of MLC. I am sure QLC is going to be even worse. Yes your SSD controllers can expand the life of these, but not enough to make up the difference in cost (up to 20% cheaper) and performance (I bet QLC will be a real slug).
Oh boy a cheap SSD that lasts 3 days in a server and is still more expensive than an HDD!
The labor costs to keep switching these out will likely outweigh the small performance benefits.
Also, 3D NAND has a long way to go to scratch today's MLC and TLC pricing. Its a brand new (read: expensive) process that until it is a 1/2yr into major production will be much more expensive.
QLC, sigh.
hmmm i think the bigger thing to notice is that the 360 has been out much longer than the Wii. Since the 360 launched in 2005, does that mean it's owner have only purchased 7 games since then? That's a bit over 2 games per year... hardly worth batting an eye at. The Wii was released in the US on Nov 11 2006 and was difficult to find until lately.. yet still outselling xbox. This means customers have had less than 2 years to buy games, and at 3.5 per system, this means a run rate of more than 2 games a year.