As always...
...the answer is *moar nukes!* See this Cold War-era program: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casaba-Howitzer
203 publicly visible posts • joined 30 Sep 2023
In the 19th century Great Britain had a law that no foreign vessels could be loaded in British ports. This ensured Britain always had a strong maritime industry, even when France could ship more cheaply.
Intel Foundry's problems would be solved overnight if the federal government banned chip imports from overseas.
Wow. Vertical tabs. Much yay.
Seriously, I suspect this is more of an issue for Firefox users, given that Firefox's tab bar and header are 1½× the size of Chromium's (for no good reason).
Now if they can just make it run faster, and make it live up to the whole privacy thing...
Thank you. You're right to say that free market economists mostly discuss over-regulation. There's a reason for that, though. Adam Smith's point is that a free market will usually maximize the welfare of its constituents without intervention. Removal of overregulation should naturally "improve the lot of the common man," which is why they discuss one and not the other.
Finally, someone in the Reg commentariat that has a functioning brain.
I always cringe a little when people argue against capitalism while enjoying all its benefits, like electronics and decent, readily-available healthcare.*
* Does not apply if you are British. Contact your local MP to claim compensation. :)
Valid points on sandboxing. It's also not feasible for things like the coreutils and stuff.
I think my Pixel has automatic recovery—at least, that's the sense I get from the Coreboot stuff—and I'm sure it could be implemented on true computers.
I'm sure there is a market, as the author says, for making something as capable as Linux and as robust as a mobile OS. There's also a market for the desktop OSes we have now!
I do like the idea of the NixOS or Guix "atomic upgrade and rollback." It's like git for an operating system. Those distros are just too weird for me to actually want to use them. I'm comfortable using Timeshift to recover files or undo changes, and I *had* manually set up a poor-man's A/B partition scheme. However, I haven't seen a problem in years, so I ditched that for a default partition layout.
If a businesslike Linux distro (i.e. not blue-haired NixOS gamers) decided to create a new, more robust package manager, and use A/B boot partitions, I'd hop on board after a few years. I think mobile devices get this right—OTA updates, sandboxed applications, and fool-proof system upgrades...
Here's the definitive report—thanks, Rockefeller Institute—and yes, lots of states do better. But they also have higher proportions of high-wage-earners and large businesses, which, thanks to the progressive tax scale, pay much more than middle- & lower-class workers, or small businesses.
Check out the 2015-2016 data. Texas was one of 12 states paying more than was received, and that was probably when I heard this...
https://rockinst.org/issue-areas/fiscal-analysis/balance-of-payments-portal/
Heh. Texas is not exactly strapped for cash as it is—we're one of the few states that put more money *in* to the federal government than we get out of it—and as a citizen, I'm curious to see what happens with this money.
We just voted on amendments to create billion-dollar funds for water, broadband, and energy infrastructure.¹ I'd love to see this go in one of those, though I don't know the rules on its usage.
1. https://www.texastribune.org/2023/11/07/texas-constitutional-amendment-election-results/
That might happen if I vote red.
On the other hand, if I vote blue, my vote in 2028 won't matter either—I'll be paying $30/gal. of gasoline by then.
I'm damned if I do & damned if I don't.
The central issue in American politics **should** be building a sound currency. Unfortunately the dollar and Social Security are the third rail of our politics—step on them and die.
This is every bank's worst nightmare. Even without regulatory actions such as fines and changes in the Board and C-suite, they've lost the community's trust.
If there's one thing people won't risk losing, it's their money. I bet at least a third of those depositors will bail in the coming months. This bank is as dead as canned Spam.
My bank once had to sent letters about a third-party home insurance provider that had a minor breach. I had no end of homeowners/mortgage-holders who were scared to death their "accounts had been hacked."
I shudder to think what EB&T's employees must be feeling...
If the FTC would regulate employment contracts, maybe it would also regulate, say, union membership?
Texas is a right-to-work state, where I don't have to deal with union BS if I don't want to. I'll keep it that way, thanks. At least it'll be my state leaders legislating instead of federal reps with a million-person constituency, and their bureaucrat henchmen...
> ...US constitution went out of its way to make it difficult for the federal government to do a great deal...
Exactly. The retrenchment clauses, supermajority, and approval of amendments by the states' legislatures all keep the federal government from changing its powers.
Of course, FDR sidestepped all that by creating a whole host of agencies, some of which were declared unconstitutional by the SCOTUS. Then he threatened to pack the court, they shut up, and things have gone downhill ever since.
Yes, stare decisis is important, but it's not the final arbiter. Remember, the Court ruled that people of African descent couldn't be citizens once upon a time. (Dred Scott v. Sandford) That precedent was overruled when the Court found it unconstitutional, and when an amendment was passed—thank heavens.
Your last paragraph is very well said! The price being set by unelected bureaucrats is taxation without representation—exactly what we are trying to avoid.