Is there a good reason to send people back to the moon?
Seems very risky and drones could do everything (and more) an astronaut could do.
76 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Aug 2023
"Some day, Fortune 1000 CEOs will finally get the message ..."
Some day the GNU/Linux zealots will get why CEOs allow windows within the organisation. When that happens the situation WILL change.
However rather than doing that, why not create another distribution and ten more text editors.
Last year (2025) a tesco cafe kiosk dropped to the desktop. I didn't need a keyboard as it kindly gave me an one screen touchscreen.
The only thing I did was to check if I had root access, and of course I did. I left a txt document on the desktop with an message commenting on the importance of "least privilege" control. (although no doubt the file would have been wiped on reboot).
At the time I was amused by it running anti-malware, but on reflection "of course it did, and quite rightly".
My younger self would be incredibly disappointed with me, that I made no attempt to hack the system to get unlimited "big breakfasts". That said I am still worried the government with insist I am arrested under the computer misuse act for leaving that text file.
Not my image but ...
https://share.google/zMvNc3cuNDQESvdRs
Over a decade ago several UK universities signed up the the "gender blind" application process. Anything that could indicate gender was removed from the process until interview. The goal was to remove the subconscious (and I guess conscious) bias against females.
(The initiative was not just academy and it was embraced in commercial environments. I recall several stories on Radio 4 about it)
Obviously the HR staff were clapping their hands together in excitement, and to be fair the IT managers at my university were all for it. I too was more than happy to play a part (selecting candidates for interview).
Years later I asked why it was never implemented, and was told it resulted in less women being invited for interview.
I can see why that should be.
Blame the Project Managers. All they care about is "on time and to budget" (and impressing their managers), this is true no matter what the size of the project. Any governance issues are dismissed with a wave of the hand (which mostly work). I lasted a few months in a NHS trust until I realised their GRC was just pretend and "getting the job done" was legitimate reason to override policy (exception requests were just rubber stamped).
It is so easy to screw up SharePoint permissions, it is so easy to unintentionally lose an intuitive ACL structure.
so many organisation employ those with the right skills, and then they leave and then...
"Hmm, can you access it now?, hmm, try again, I don't get it, hmm, once last time. Oh! that's great! I'll close the job"
MS: Hmmmm ...... access control is so flexible,
I have worked in many environments and it is chalk and cheese with companies that outsource their IT and those that don't. Outsourcing will never be able to provide the flexibility that Cyber Security requires. To request a change when outsourcing IT requires tiers of management to approve and to find funding for even the simplest of change or improvement. Those in the management tier have the direction of not submitting any change due to the expense and "leave it to the next contract". When you have your own IT staff, they are falling over themselves for projects (which is not always a good thing) and to improve services.
I often wonder if an off the shelf trusted and established application, with internal support staff can create a better and MORE FLEXIBLE service. My experience ends in 1997 when the benefit agency brought in consultants to look at the IT services, and they scrapped in house solutions and contracted out. The results were as you would expect. I remember we could not ask for bugs to be fixed because it had been signed off and we could only make a handful of “feature requests” per year
Lots of reasons. However the primary reason is managers not one taking responsibility/accountability by suggesting something they could be blamed for. Once someone has suggested “X” then X it is, and we know who to blame when it al goes wrong. This attitude runs from top to bottom on the management hierarchy. In my experience poor project management is something the UK excels at.
Hold your horses. You do know that a hack to allow positive discrimination is to declare a diverse workforce as a requirement of the organisation. The organisation (HR) will produce lots of graphs about the financial benefit of diversity. Points will be awarded to select candidates and at interview based on what they can contribute to the companies diversity.
They have ridiculous job titles to sound impressive when they leave. I must admit an application from a " Lead Cyber Security Expert" at GCHQ would go on top of the interview pile.
My young colleagues tell me that "job cat fishing" (or is it phishing) is also a thing, where employers big up the role that does not reflect what you will be doing.
"Penn State abandoned its contract with **government-compliant** cloud host Box in favor of OneDrive, which doesn't meet NIST's CUI security requirements, to save money"
I've been there countless times with UK universities, that get IT to do their Information Governance. IT make a decision without consultation and when it all kicks off when they tell users to move data to the new repository they off the advice "go back to the stakeholder, explain that there is no difference in security". I can guarantee IT would have said "will it be okay if you encrypt the data on one drive?".
Keep an eye out on pen testing companies even those based in the UK.
I have audited companies that have employed a third party pen testing company to do their pen test (fair enough), and while the pen testing company is genuine and none malicious, they are often unable to provide meaningful assurance on the contractors they employ.
So more reason to remove the air gapped networks and have all the sensitive information "on the internet". WSUS requires just two ports to be open, what's the betting that the cloud "alternative" requires a whole host of URLs with ever changing IPs and multitudes of ports for our on prem servers to access them.
I will miss typing "wuauclt /reportnow and /detectnow" (although one of them didn't work, but I can never remember which so I used both.
This will become more of an issue as companies get to grip with supply chain security. While you are rightly defending FOSS another groups of people are congratulating you for making an excellent point on the lack of assurance with Open Source and hence why it should not be used in a prod environment.