Poorly researched and off point.
I think your confused / changing the definition of open source.
Open source has always meant just that, no more and now less. Even proprietary software could be open source (there was a time when buying a software license included the source code).
You seem to be talking about FLOSS and FOSS software, that's software that is free and open source software, that is “free” as in freedom.
See gnu.org/philosophy/floss-and-foss.en.html
Biting the hand that feeds IT
