A fourth book...
Is shown to the acckuntants, who otherwise might be tempted to turn you in to the taxman for the reward...
35 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Apr 2023
The last time I sat through insider information training, it was explained to me that any company information not released to the public (i.e. via a press release, published on our website, or reported in official , public filings) may be material insider information.
I cannot beleive that Casey Muggleston was not given similar training.
In other parts of the world, there is a certain expectation of privacy even in the workpkace. For example, it is illegal in my country to place cameras in private offices. It is also illegal to routinely monitor what one is entering on the work-supplied equipment.
This does not mean that no monitoring can take place. For example, phone, email and nerwork logs are legal, and the employer can have IT examine any work-supplied equipment for contraband.
The idea is to provide a reasonable balance between the employer's needs and the worker's rights.
This is the first time I have heard of any government initiative actually reducing the size of the civil service. Unfortunately, it is unlikely to last. I expect that as the shortcomings of AI agents come to light, the number of supervisory staff will increase and swamp any putative savings
"the First Sea Lord General Sir Gwyn Jenkins said that there was still very much a place for the navy in the modern world, but that adopting new technology is critical to its future capabilities."
Leaving aside the "gunboat diplomacy" of the past, navies are essential to police national and international waters against bad actors such as the Somali and Houthi pirates, and rogue states such as Iran. This need will exist until the Millennium comes, and all men are brothers.
Navies are now vulnerable to asymmetric warfare. It costs much less to overwhelm the defences of a ship with (say) 1000 drones than it does to build a new ship. The last time that the West faced such a problem was during WWII, with the Japanese kamikaze pilots.
IMAO, the way to solve the asymmetric warfare problem is not to build expensive unmanned ships, but to design cheap defences. A laser system, for example, could shoot down drones at a cost of a few £s per shot for the electeicity required.
(I am aware of the problems involving inclement weather etc., but if no one attempts to solve these problems, they definitely won't be solved.)
When developing a large project or when trying to find a bug, it is important to have the same compilation environment throughout the lifetime of the project. Failure to do so may introduce new bugs or cause some bugs to disappear. Auto-updates make preserving the environment impossible.
Home users basically can't buy a computer without Microslop installed
Not quite true. Many manufacturers are selling laptops (and possibly desktops, haven't checked) with no O/S, with FreeDOS, or with Linux installed. I agree that the first two options are unlikely to be chosen by the typical home user, but they are available.
How about banning those who delivered groceries to his New York apartment? Those who delivered groceries to his island? At what point does one draw a line in the sand and say "this business relationship is tainted by Epstein's crimes"?
I would say that the only ones who should be banned are those who either participated in his crimes or had knowledge of them and did nothing.
The downloader behaved extremely stupidly by demanding "something in return" for returning the downloaded files. He deserves the trouble that he's getting.
OTOH, how were the Dutch police going to verify that the files were actually deleted? Do they have a remote shredder? :)
Using your analogy, who appointed the researchers Guardians of the Public Security?
In the days when we still had policemen on the beat, they (in some jurisdictions) might have been expected to check whether shops or warehouses were locked at night and to notify the proprietors if they were not. This was considered part of their job as Public Safety Officers. The researchers have no such public (or private) sanction.