Re: Banning stuff
Is the issue with those who have phones that they are forcing others to use them?
782 publicly visible posts • joined 8 Feb 2023
"I've yet to meet anyone make a credible argument it does more good than harm."
Should this be necessary to decide whether there's a ban? Personally, the sole reason I have a Facebook account is to talk to other home machining and additive manufacturing hobbyists. I'm not one of those people who makes politics their entire personality so the algorithm never shows me rage inducing political drivel, though it does show me the odd stupid 'uplifting' story (e.g. man heard meowing, you'll never guess what happens next).
Hand an appliance without a plug to the average person today and the majority will probably either sit by their dead appliance or harm themselves trying to wire it with the plug in the socket. That doesn't mean we should ban wire strippers, just stick a warning on them and point the buyer in the direction of a good book.
Edit: equally, the majority of television shows are rubbish but I don't think that justifies a ban or diminishes the importance of the better stuff.
I don't think any significant number of people who advocate for PoW or PoS based digital currencies are advocatingc for CBDCs. Contrawise, I think CBDC advocates (they exist too) have an even more negative view of PoW and PoS than the average Reg commenter.
In my personal view, the former are silly but people have a right to be silly while the latter offer governments a lever of personal control that makes chat control and age gates seem trivial. In the hands of a government that views VPNs as a problem, they're terrifying; in the hands of a totalitarian government, they're apocalyptic.
I think the CSAM ingestion accusation is a bit of a stretch. Most diffusion models can generate fairly photographic images of clearly impossible things by bodging together known concepts (e.g. A pink elephant in a rice paddy or a Ferrari drawn in the style of Da Vinci).
As for the why of editing photos, the reasons are too broad to list but the phenomenon of people touching up photos is hardly unique to diffusion models and is as old as photography (have a look at why photoshop tools like dodge and burn have those icons).
Pushing satellites 'off towards the sun' is very much not an option, that's an incredible delta-V, as is sending something up to retrieve them (slightly more plausible but incredibly expensive). The reach issue comes down to the distance to the surface increasing with latitude; increasing latency further and attenuation from both inverse square and atmospheric traversal. Honestly, it really does feel like a heck of a reach to justify GEO for 2 way communication in the era when more than large businesses and super yacht owners are employing satellites to get online. I would suggest you simulate that level of latency if you doubt its impact.
As for questioning whether the customer base justifies the number of starlink satellites, at some point, you're arguing that they're not interested in profits, given that they already achieved global coverage so more launches would represent additional operating expenses.
GEO requires fewer satellites if you're running a transmission-only (e.g. TV) operation but consider that even the latest Viasat-3 tops out at 1Tbps per satellite (ignoring the catastrophic antenna failure F1 suffered), which is 10k simultaneously connected customers (assuming 100Mbps). Viasat-2 is a mere 300Gbps per satellite. It's also worth bearing in mind that GEO is limited to one very exclusive inclination/shell to actually achieve the geostationary part. This is why the affordable Viasat tiers are data capped and they achieved peak users of 0.6M in 2020. It made sense in the era of satellite internet customers being businesses needing extreme redundancy and extremely wealthy private individuals.
As per the ESA, Kessler becomes a risk above 800km:
https://www.esa.int/Space_Safety/Space_Debris/About_space_debris
well above Starlink's current operations or plans.
[deleted and reposted because the edit window passed]
The aspect to consider regarding dwell time and drag in an elliptical orbit is the Oberth Effect. Just as using an engine at periapsis can boost the apoapsis efficiently, the drag efficiently drops it. Additionally, the debris will have a far larger cross sectional area than the original satellite, in much the same way as comparing an in-tact feather pillow and a torn open one.
Regarding GEO overall: the issue is one of crowding and limited reach. A GEO only works over the equator, barring or complicating communication from high latitudes. Inclined and/or elliptical orbits are possible but that requires a steerable antenna for each customer and a constellation (in other words, running into the same issues as Starlink if you're concerned about orbital crowding). Plus, all the way out at GEO altitudes, Kessler syndrome starts to become an issue because of the very long dwell time of debris.
Regarding latency: I'd suggest giving jagt's clumsy (on Github) a go to get a feel for what 500-700ms latency feels like on an Internet connection. It's not a terribly fun experience unless you're using it to end that very annoying Teams meeting; crank the latency, use speakers instead of a microphone (so the noise suppression fails) and watch your dear fellow callers deal with the fascinating effects of Delayed Audio Feedback on speech.
You've reminded me of a prank that worked beautifully: a junior manager had left his computer unlocked over lunch so I used his webcam to take a picture of his superior (in on this) peeking around his door. I set the picture as his Teams background and, after lunch, the hybrid meeting started.
At the appropriate moment, I knocked on the table with noise suppression off. Having a desk that faces the door, the junior manager looks at his feed, then turns around to find a closed door before almost falling off his chair when the same boss speaks to him from Teams.
The point of the propulsion is to overcome atmospheric drag. If the atmosphere is thinner, what do you think that might do to the demands on the propulsion system?
Also, DARPA projects can benefit humanity as a WHOLE. GPS being made accessible to all, for free, in the wake of the KAL007 tragedy being a prominent example.
I expect the refer to the last 10 days of performance, mirroring the modest slide on the S&P 500. If the current trend represents a 'bubble' 'popping' then that has to be the lowest pressure bubble in history (this isn't an argument for or against it being a bubble, merely a comment on using 10 days of weak market data to determine it).
I presume they either weren't alive in 2008, they don't actually invest in stocks or that year was so devastating that they obliterated all memory of it.
Party loyalty (i.e. being able to count on a group of people to overlook all your malfeasance to prevent the other party from winning) is evaporating faster than vodka in a hot frying pan. This creates an incentive for the incumbent party to massively overreach under the guise of 'protecting democracy/the children' because the idea of simply sticking to their manifesto promises and listening to the public on everything else is unthinkable to them.
It's a concept I fundamentally disagree with because it disproportionately favours the police but the legal term is Adverse Inference. Definitely worth reading up on so that you're properly aware of your actual rights (or, rather, the limits of them).
Give me expandable storage, a passable camera and a reasonably low lag experience and I'm happy. The last time I bought a new phone (entry level Galaxy) was because I needed an eSim option. A few years ago, it felt like there were actual reasons to upgrade, now, it's just because updates have ceased or the battery is toast and replacing it costs more than replacing the whole device.
I also don't see the appeal of foldables because the screen is so fragile.
That's largely the product of safety and efficiency legislation pushing manufacturers into a corner. Back when you were allowed to sell a car with the aerodynamics of a house brick that would bisect a pedestrian if they so much as stumbled into it, there was much more wiggle room.
Ironically, the same rules that mean a pedestrian has to be ejected back onto the pavement and handed a nice cup of tea in the process means it's not possible to see children over the bonnet.
Also why you shouldn't take your laptop swimming. The sudden loss of wifi when underwater confuses the OS and, in its panic, it fries all the components. It's still safe to put them in Faraday bags because the darkness is relaxing, just like it is for birds.
That depends on your outlook. I do remember the sixteen million versions of Vista but, at the same time, it allows updates to be rolled out quickly once the new features have been verified as stable. That way, they can trickle new code out slowly without breaking everything for everyone if one part proves problematic.
Further, if you're on a particularly poor connection it saves one big lump of downloads (the counter being that your connection gets slowly used all the time, possibly with code that will never get enabled). It also spreads out the time to install updates (the counter being that it fills your drive.
While it is potentially abusable, it's not quite the same as a car manufacturer replacing a simple switch and relay on a heated seat with a signal that goes through a computer which only turns your heated seat on if you pay up.
That's my primary setup too. It's not so much seeing the ads in FF, it's that each video takes a solid minute to start playing and YouTube pops up a 'helpful' hint that the poor performance might be the fault of my ad blocker. Perhaps they're trying new code but, when it is happening, Brave seems to do just fine, playing immediately.
Personally, I use it for YouTube because I find whatever advertising is actually taking place* less intrusive. I find 30s ads every 5 minutes or a minute for a video to load while YouTube fights with ublock to be more bother than having another browser installed on my system.
*I think there was one pop up about their own crypto but, unlike a Microsoft prompt to sign in or a YouTube prompt to show me shorts, when I told it to go away forever, it did