"Oh no!!!"
Said absolutely no one...
620 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Jan 2023
Notice the hands in the video are quite anthropomorphic whilst the "hands" in the still picture are terrifying alien like grappling hooks...
I would have thought for a controlled environment like a factory assembly floor the flexibility of humanoid robots is a completely unnecessary expense and doesn't really get you very far down the road towards being able to operate in unstructured environments like homes.
They answer is in the question, LLM's are language models. They model language and they produce output that looks like language in response to inputs also in language. Language is of course quite important for the communication and discussion of ideas and knowledge but on its own it does not give rise to those things. Necessary but not sufficient.
No fan of NAT, but SIP broke itself all by itself by embedding the end-point for the RTP stream in its payload. A very important design goal is that the payload should have no knowledge of the protocol it is being transported over. What is needed is a way of referencing other end-points in the protocol header that the application can pull out as needed. If there was such a thing as a translating gateway it would be well documented as to how to translate these other end-point references. You'd still need all the UPnP nonsense though to start listening for the incoming stream.
Same thing that can break ftp although I think in nearly-2026 if you are doing ftp over the public internet you've got other problems....
Your point about API's is a bit of a non-sequitur. v6 had to introduce new variants of all of those. Difference is that v6 and v4 will forever live in parallel with each other whereas a v4.1 could have eventually absorbed v4 as a sub-set.
If they'd known back then they had decades to migrate then no doubt different choices would have been made. But they didn't so they didn't. Do you need any help to get down off your high horse?
I'm sure with a bit of creativity the optional headers in v4 could have been made to carry additional address octets. The argument against that is always about speed of routing but If you only use the extra address depth within private networks then that problem is greatly reduced because the core routers would never even look at the additional address depth.
That way instead of my ISP giving me a /29, which is an extremely wasteful way of letting me have 2 or 3 public facing servers, they give me a /32 (or a /40 or a /48) and I figure it out from there on down. Cloud providers could put literally thousands of servers behind each traditional v4 address whilst still having them all directly addressable. Hell, they could even charge more for putting you higher up in the routing strata.
Rule 101 about getting people to migrate to Shiny New Thing is make it completely backwards compatible with Crappy Old Thing so nothing needs to change on day one. I've used v4 almost my entire adult life but I expect to go to my grave without ever touching v6.
Its on the removable bottom cover. Could dispose of that separately provided you have whatever non-standard screwdriver bit they are using this year to get it off. It'll still be burned into the electronics on the main board if that is recovered in a functioning state.
My OCD requires me to change the cover whenever I change the main board so that they stay matched...
If the information you are looking for is in any way quantitative, i.e. where an exact match is required, not a "its got the same letters and numbers just not in the right order" sort of match, then its a lot less less than 90%, and more like 0% if the information you are looking for is at all unusual. Absolute waste of time and energy, literally.
Unfortunately all forms of search are going the same way. Ebay used to be a hold out where it always gave you exact matches, then they brought in a bit of spell correction, now its gone full on batshit, random. I have recently had several cases where I could search for two words that I knew were in the title of a given listing and it refused to show me that listing. I use ebay a lot for tech and car parts, close enough isn't, errr, close enough for me. Why does that make me some kind of outlier?
Sounds like the sort of fanciful promises that were made for 5G. I believe we are still waiting for that version of the future to arrive.
Sure, you might be able to build applications over the top of it, for example based on its ability to sense the density of surrounding objects (which incidentally Wiz smart bulbs already do in a very simplistic manner to imply occupancy), but if anyone does they'll be crap and won't be supported beyond the initial poc.
At the moment 11ac does everything I need. I might get 11ax soon as the prices of used AP's reach pocket money level. One thing I've noticed though is that some 11ax AP's, particularly the ones with 2.5G uplinks, require POE+ i.e. they use more power than previous generations. Didn't see anything in the article promising smaller, less visually intrusive, more power efficient devices...
In my experience its usually the developers themselves who are so unhappy with the mess that's resulted from unending demands to deliver something, anything no matter how quick and dirty, pleading to be allowed to start over with a clean sheet, sometimes in a new language or with a new framework. Just give us 3 months to rewrite and then we promise we'll get back onto your pipeline of unreasonable requests with renewed vigour.
When there is no balance of power between product owner and developers its inevitable it will all collapse, its only a question of how long it manages to stumble forward for. Magic fairy dust can't fix that interplay.
You've obviously never looked at the output of ntpq.
Ntp is a very clever piece of software. Its one of the few internet protocols that has pages of mathematics behind it. If you set it up correctly with a handful of upstream sources to choose from the result is perfect time keeping for most practical day to day needs.
I just booked flights on some dodgy website referred by flightscanner. Honestly I must have had to click through a dozen pages of dark patterns trying to upsell me everything from insurance to automatic check in. What are the chances of an automated agent getting through that shit-storm without taking out a lifetime subscription to Encyclopedia Britannica along the way?
As it was I did opt for their optional "prime" subscription in return for 20 quid off. Supposedly cancel within 21 days from the account page to avoid the annual charge. All the account page does is direct you to call a phone number -- speak to a human! The AI powered live chat also directs you to call the phone number - speak to a human! The phone number answers with an AI agent which once it confirms your identity and that you want to cancel puts you on hold so that you can -- speak to a human! The human who finally answered then spent 5 minutes trying to sell me on the prime advantages. Nope, not interested, cancel me. Ok, we can offer you an 80% discount, instead of 100 quid it will only be 20 quid and we'll throw in some vouchers too. So that's me flat except I have punted the pain of cancelling it 12 months down the road. Now that I think about it, I'm an absolute idiot for having squandered this chance to get out.
So there's an indictment of the state of AI. Its still not good enough to negotiate discounts as a bribe to keep your business. No doubt we will look back on theses halcyon days with great longing for when it was possible to -- speak to a human!
At my last place (literally last because I haven't worked since), the DevOps guys seemed to be absolutely convinced that they ran the company. They acted as if they were the product. Instead of just being a service that sits in the background in support of actual external customer facing activities. From what I hear their attitude hasn't been corrected in the last 24 months...
Have you ever looked at the figures for pumped storage as a proportion of overall UK generation? Its little more than a rounding error. Absolutely tiny. And all the good sites are already taken.
Existing schemes like Cruachan were built at the same time as the first generation Magnox reactors. Not as a way to store energy but as a way to provide a responsive infill for peaking demand. The infamous rush to boil the kettle during the advert break. Nuclear plants being incapable of throttling up and down rapidly. Those nuclear plants also gave birth to the off-peak tariff for the same reason that you couldn't turn them down very much overnight so you had to find a market for the output no matter how much of a haircut you were forced to take.
Yes, plans are afoot to build new, bigger schemes but they are still modest in the great scheme of things. To be able to do hydro at a meaningful scale you need the geography of Norway. Norway sells us a near constant 1.4GW. None of our schemes will get anywhere near that. For a few hours maybe, but not 24x7 day in, day out.
And wind doesn't just go off for a few hours. When there is a depression it can go off for days on end. Usually in the winter when solar is doing bugger all. Storage to cover this shortfall involves just staggeringly big numbers. The potential energy of moving mass around just can't cover that. You need the energy density of chemical bonds.
What GBE should really be doing is buying up gas stations so that these can be run on a non-profit basis when they are required (not if). Be the generator of last resort. At the same time take responsibility for a strategic reserve of the fuel needed to power those stations to decouple us from global shocks that require domestic energy prices to be reset every 3 months.
The other problem is that rewriting brings to light existing stuff that doesn't work, or doesn't work as expected. Do you maintain that brokenness in your new shiny version because that's what people are used to? Or do you do force your "correct" version on everyone (if you ever finish the rewrite that is...).
Right, the m4 macros are so much more obtuse than just learning the config file in the first place that I could never bring myself to use them. I still run a hand-crafted sendmail.cf on the family mail server. It doesn't get changed very often... The thing that many find difficult is that the rewriting rules are declarative not procedural so you need to put your brain into a different mode to follow them.
I lived in a company apartment in NYC for a year. The internet service was via cable modem but only the downlink, the uplink was over the phone line. Obviously I brought along the server running my DNS and email so the phone line was pretty much permanently pegged up by the server. I believe local calls were free but wasn't there a time limit after which they started charging? I was never asked to pay anything...
When I moved back to the UK, DSL was in its embryonic days fortunately.
There'a a robot lawnmower on a front garden near me. Every time I pass and see it I marvel that its still there. Presumably its geo-locked or paired with the base station to make theft pointless but a crim may not realise that until after they've made off with it.
Yeah but most people would give up food and warmth before their mobile...
If and when people become that price sensitive then you set up an MVNO offering much the same service at a cheaper price point. Throw in a few freebies like unlimited Whatsapp to differentiate yourself from all the other providers.
The secret of commerce isn't selling the most at the highest possible price point, its selling at ALL possible price points to the full spectrum of potential customers. Make each of them think they are on a special rate (cheap as chips or reassuringly expensive) but its essentially the same product with a bit of window dressing each time. Car manufacturers are masters of this.
"to offer basic vision for the blind"
Not really, the sense of vision is very much done inside the brain. What these implants are doing is stimulating the optic nerve in a way somewhat similar to how the retina would. Fantastic stuff but in no way related to AI.
My assertion is that AGI will never happen. Certainly not on the trajectory we are currently following with generative LLM's. Like the man said, its nothing more than a fancy cut and paste. An evolutionary dead-end. ML will have some uses. Once trained up its not bad at various forms of diagnosis but that's just pattern recognition, its not like it worked it out from first principles.
In an other area of commerce returns like that would be so dramatically and obviously indicate that the solution was unfit for purpose that you would expect the contract to be dissolved and the provider to scuttle off back under a rock in abject shame.
But not with AI/ML. Keep shoveling the 50 pound notes into the furnace...
I've gotten more and more into the habit of leaving my wallet behind and relying on my phone so losing it when some distance from home represents a bit of a nightmare scenario.
My bank allows me to withdraw from an ATM without a card but you need to generate a code in the app... Setting up the app on a different phone istr is a massive faff of confirmation codes that might even involve a letter in the post. Finding a branch thats still open and staffed would be nothing short of miraculous. I think I'll get back into the habit of carrying a physical wallet.