Posts by IlGeller

Microsoft to offer ChatGPT-as-a-service from Azure real soon now

Re: A suggested experiment

If you don't want garbage, then talk to Lexical Clones. For example, clone Hegel by collecting all his texts and structuring them. Or Plato.

It's time to think about the fate of Intellectual Property in America. About what a terrible price an inventor has to pay if his discovery is patented.

AI-generated phishing emails just got much more convincing

Soon the Internet shall die, and a number of private databases will arise. For example, Microsoft's private database. No fishing, phishing or other types of fraud in such the database!

Scientists tricked into believing fake abstracts written by ChatGPT were real

No one believed me when I won the NIST TREC QA. Now you see that I was telling the truth.

They are real: OpenAI have a database of structured texts and changes them, adjusting for a request. Thus OpenAI, ChatGPT parasitizes on written by human texts.

Meta develops AI targeting system to show housing ads to wider range of users

Meta has no chance in competition with Microsoft and the technology used by OpenAI. They both can target ads really according to their meaning and exactly to those people who can and want to buy. But Meta cannot develop and apply the same technology due to "reputational damage".

Microsoft may be counting out $10 billion to inject into OpenAI

Re: I don't think Microsoft are that interested in Advertising

Microsoft and OpenAI can find a needle in a haystack, which Google can't replicate: Google has the old, and Microsoft and OpenAI the new technology

Re: I don't think Microsoft are that interested in Advertising

Microsoft will not invest $10 billion in the world dominance, this is absurd. I guess that in the near future Microsoft can announce the launch of its own database, which will replace the Internet. The bottom line is that Microsoft should get money for the accuracy of its search, taking the money from those who provide the information, making the money on its processing, preparation and using the code of OpenAI. This is my prediction.

Of course! The technology used by OpenAI is a development of the one that Google uses. This means that Microsoft can completely take away all advertising from Google, plus multiply many times the advertising market.

Since humans can't manage fusion, the US puts millions into AI-powered creation

No, I continued Einstein's Theory of Relativity and all that was and is in Physics should be revised taking into account the fact that the Avogadro number is the only objectivity, and any measure of any "distance between" (speed, energy) is subjective.

The era of mathematical speculations, which are not based on experiment, is over. From now on, if you want to say a word in Physics, then be kind enough to prove what you have said by experiment. The way I did. For instance explaining the thermonuclear fusion by Poincare's theorem, molar volume and number of elements (Avogadro number), which are proved by periodical table, double-slit and quantum entanglement.

Gravity does not exist at all, since all forces in Physics, within the framework of the continuation of Einstein's Theory of Relativity based on the Theory of Sets, are reduced to one.

Within the framework of what has been done recently (for thermonuclear fusion), we are talking about the restoration of the structure, when only such a number of elements exists in a given volume. What is Poincaré's Recurrence Theorem. What, for example, can be seen from the periodic table of elements. The "hohlraum holding a pallet of thermonuclear fuel, a frozen mixture of hydrogen isotopes" set the volume, a mixture of tritium and deuterium gave the elements.

Another thing is that this "thermonuclear fusion" has nothing to do with what allows stars and atoms to exist.

Never. I changed Postulate 2 of Einstein: my new reading

Postulate II: The inclusion time of the minimum element in any set is the minimum possible.

Einstein the same:

Postulate 2 (the principle of constancy of the speed of light). The speed of light in a vacuum is the same in all coordinate systems moving rectilinearly and uniformly relative to each other.

Doing so I introduced the Set Theory and points of accumulation to Physics, which helps me to stop the use of “distance between”, speed, energy. Based on the same I found that photon is a particle without a hint of wave in it and explained both double-slit and quantum entanglement experiments.

Yes, from now on "distance between", speed, acceleration and energy will not be used in Physics. In favor of which the double-slit, quantum entanglement and Lebedev light pressure experiments speak. As well as the presence of the perihelion of Mercury. Sorry, but everything has changed.

According to the periodic table only such a number of elements can be in a given volume (the Avogadro number), which is the postulate I of the continuation of Einstein's Theory of Relativity; where the standard model sets the standard for such a smallest element as a photon. (Continuation is a quantitative theory because it uses quantities instead of distance-velocity-acceleration-and-energy.) Thus, when tritium and deuterium atoms are decomposed into their elements (by means of laser strikes, that is photons which cause the increase of the atoms' elements and following distruction), the elements return to the structure that is given by the volume of the hohlraum ("hohlraum holding a pallet of thermonuclear fuel, a frozen mixture of hydrogen isotopes", where the pallet is pepper-sized corn). Apparently, the volume of Holraum determines that these elements, according to the Poincare Recurence Theorem and the postulate I of continuation, become helium atoms: tritium is an unstable isotope, and the volume and number of elements make it helium. Meanwhile, the extra (probably photons, although there may be particles) give energy output.

The key is in the holraum volume. However, how the same “holraum volume” can be achieved for a more “frozen mixture of hydrogen isotopes” is a mystery. Better to work with the forth kind of points, which feeds stars and atoms indeed, knowing that the "synthesis" has nothing with it. (The first two kinds a re described by Newton as material points and strings (of String Theory), the third by Cantor as accumulation poinfs, the forth is unknown.)

Can the process described in the article be called "synthesis"? Probably it can.

What for? What sense does it make? Stars and atoms have existed forever on the basis that is not of thermonuclear fusion, but due to a completely different mechanism. The key to understanding this mechanism is given by the development of Einstein's Theory of Relativity based on Set Theory (which the development has been proven by a lot of different experiments, from double-slit to quantum entanglement).

AI is primarily a search technology, based on the structuring of existing texts. But how can you find something that is not there?

Microsoft’s Nadella: Tech is in for a rough two years

I hope that Microsoft will start making real money on the technology underlying ChatGPT as soon as possible.

Cybercrooks are telling ChatGPT to create malicious code

No, that's not how it works. In order to search and find the right answers, and then rewrite them in the required format, initially is needed a database of texts. And in this database the existence of crooks and scammers is impossible, since such can be instantly detected. This is a database!

America's nuclear fusion 'breakthrough' is super-hot ... yet far from practical

"The hohlraum holding the pellet of fusion fuel, a frozen mix of hydrogen isotopes".

Quantitative theory, the basics of which — like its only axiom and both postulates — you can find on the Internet by searching for "Ilya Geller Quantitive theory" — will reveal that in a certain molar volume there is always only such a certain number of elements (molar mass); which is proved by the existence of the Avogadro number and the periodic table.

So, hohlraum holding sets the volume for frozen elements, that is initially the volume that is smaller than for tritium and deuterium heated to a plasma state. Also, the heating with lasers destroys the nucleons of these two substances. After the heating tritium and deuterium, being decomposed into elements, are in the original volume of hohlraum (which is small) since its material did not have time to evaporate.

Then everything goes according to the Poincare Reccurence Theorem: in a given volume, only such a number of elements forms only this particular substance. Judging by what is said in the article helium was formed. The extra matter, according again to the article, prowide some energy. Therefore if the results are replicated by many third parties, then we can say that both the ergodic Poincare Theorem and the Quantitative Theory have received another practical proof by experiment.

“Controlled synthesis" is a matter of days long gone, since the attempt to obtain energy was made on an erroneous basis. I'm well aware of how crazy I sound, because I'm the only one who understands what I'm talking about. However my words are confirmed by double-slit and quantum entanglement experiments, as well as the orbit of Mercury and the existence of “bias current". That's why I'm talking and demanding attention.

The continuation of Einstein's Theory of Relativity, without distance-acceleration-speed-energy-geometry, based on Set Theory gives an idea that the existance of stars, black holes and atoms has its cause in the exit of points of the fourth kind into our Universe, where the accumulation points are the third, and the other two were described in detail by Newton; proof of which is the presence of light. Thus, the extraction of an unlimited amount of clean energy is possible, but not through the synthesis. This is the same energy which allows atoms exist for billions years.

In principle, what happened (if it really happened) confirms Poincare's Reccurence Theorem — certain dynamical systems will, after a sufficiently time, return to a state arbitrarily close to (for continuous state systems), or exactly the same as (for discrete state systems), their initial state; there mine "the number of elements" is used from the point of view of my continustion of Einstein's Theory of Relativity on a quantitative basis. Apparently, heating literally decomposed the nucleons into smaller and smallest elements with their subsequent return to a certain molar volume, while electrons evaporation olnly is out of the question. The whole atoms are reduced to their elements, not only electrons deleted.

I feel I can mention my continuation of Einstein, because this theory is proven by experiments with double slits and quantum entanglement, along with many others; which gives me the right to speak and be heard. The present thermonuclear experiment may (if it really was made) or proves the fundamental and the basis for my quantitative theory ergodical Theorem of Poincare.

Study finds AI assistants help developers produce code that's more likely to be buggy

Agree: Garbage in, garbage out.

Investor tells Google: Cut costs now and stop paying staff so much

As you can see, I am a man of my word: ChatGPT makes almost all IT companies obsolete and hundreds of billions, if not trillions will be lost in the nearest future. Mostly with Google and FB, as well as with all Internet and database companies. Actually with all IT market.

Carmack quits Meta, brands it inefficient and unprepared for competition

Zucker's main task is to stop the used by OpenAI ChatGPT bot AI technology in any way and by all means! FB have been making a lot of money on advertising and development of ChatGPT bot stops that.

OpenAI predicts biz can break a billion in revs by 2024

In principle Open AI can take away the entire advertising market. The used AI technology is a search technology, which leads to the attachment of advertisements to the most suitable places. Thus a lot more than $1 billion can be achieved and very fast.

TikTok could be banned from America, thanks to proposed bipartisan bill

Do not worry about TikTok or any other social and not so services. The new technology presented at the OpenAI will change all.

Oracle clouds never go down, says Oracle's Larry Ellison

A new AI database is used by ChatGPT. Ideologically, it opposes to SQL, since all entries in it are annotated with text and this is done automatically. While in SQL the same records are annotated manually and almost never in text. Therefore, Oracle will soon lose SQL as the main source of its income. Oracle shall also lose Java very soon, because, for example, DeepMind (Google) already knows how to do without manual code and programmers. As for ads Oracle should compete with the same ChatGPT-Microsoft technology. The same with Oracle healthcare: Microsoft and ChatGPT. What left?

Only AI, that is, the tough competition with Microsoft left to Oracle

Voice assistants failed because they serve their makers more than they help users

Google won’t launch ChatGPT rival because of ‘reputational risk’ they said. Brin, Page and Zuker afraid to steal again: they can lose all they have.

Stealing patents and bribing a judge is not the solution to the problem. That's why nothing works.

GitHub adds admin controls to Copilot, paints 'Business' on the side, doubles price

As you can see I'm right: DeepMind’s AlphaCode Conquers Coding, Performing as Well as Humans, today they said. Microsoft is the next.

Within a few months Microsoft will close GitHub and start a project similar to Google's AlphaCode. That is, it will switch to writing programs instead of searching for suitable pieces of code. Which will mean the end of programmers and programming.

Microsoft reportedly mulls a does-everything 'super app' to expand mobile search

Re: Instead of incoherent texts from Internet?

There is no a single and abstract artificial intelligence. Each artificial intelligence replicates, reproduces a real person, who is its prototype. With all his character traits (bais) and knowledge. OpenAI demonstrates this.

For example, twenty years ago I reproduced Hillary Clinton and Philip Dormer Stanhope, 4th Earl of Chesterfield, with their writings and speeches; as OpenAI now reproduces unknown people. I also did the same (lexically cloned) with Alan Greenspan and President Bush, in 2002, a few years before PA Advisors vs Google. After PA Advisors I couldn't continue for 12 years, thanks to people from Google and FB.

I didn't explain how to create a real artificial intelligence? I have repeated many times: the real artificial intelligence is obtained by lexical cloning of one person, with respect to his bias. Try, for instance, use (separately) the writings of Dickens, Shakespeare, Mark Twain or Barack Obama? Instead of incoherent texts from Internet? And you will get what you want: the genuine AI.

Look what happened when Openal, instead of producing the stupid model GPT-3, cloned real people with respect to their biases, and got lexical clones? What splash it produced? Even if these people, at the first glance, were not... the indeed great thinkers, of the caliber of Hegel or Einstein? Now imagine that all the texts of Poincare, Plato or Lenin are used? I tried it many years ago, I know.

By the way, not only Google and Fb will suffer from the fact that Microsoft established firmly its database, taking what was left of the Internet. Almost all IT companies, let me say 98%, will soon go out of business, as they will not be able to catch up with Microsoft, which has began its spur 5-6 years ago. "Hee-hee," I gloat.

In any case, there will be no crime online, as there will be no more anonymity. Social networks will change because now you will immediately find people close to you in spirit. Not bad in my opinion? Well, for me personally justice will prevail, those who robbed me will be punished and the largest fortunes will disappear like snow under the sun. Also not bad?

Re: what MS reportedly want is a way to drive more searches to Bing, grow its advertising business

This is not about Google, but the abolition of the Internet as such! If Microsoft can find anything and everything without losing an iota of information, it means that Microsoft has created a database instead of the Internet. At the same time, there will be only one Microsoft search in the database, because this is Microsoft database. All other search engines are simply not needed in it. Consequently, Google remains out of work.

All information in this Microsoft database is ads and eventually it will charge for everything happens in it. Indeed, Microsoft already charges for the ads making.

Not really a browser: it's a database where everything is known and controlled. That is, goodbye Internet and hello Microsoft database.

Re: does-everything 'super app'

Several trillion, sorry. Have respect to Microsoft and Bill Gates personally. Hats off!

Of course it does! Now Microsoft has Internet and database industry.