Re: Artemis schedule is political nonsense
Come on, who does not want to fly with a literal cascading failure with practically zero headroom for failure?
106 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Dec 2022
So you mean that 2 years before an actual moon mission the status is that there is no idea if the rocket is able to lift off from the platform and they are focusing on detecting the failure modes prior to launch to collect some data?
Usually the data collection phase is 5-10+ years before the actual product materialises..
So you have the esoteric intutitive knowledge we all should rely on instead of controlled test arrangement, statistical analysis etc plus full description of used methods etc?
Yeah I know that when people excluding the ass kissers agree about something,.they probably are into something. And if there is no better information available, you should definitely trust it.
But when there is better information available that seems to be perfectly in line with the things that are generally agreed on, it baffles me that someone thinks the research was pointless and we could be equally fine without it. Just think about how many of us have had to learn it through many hard knocks and now it is not necessary anymore since you can just cite a paper...
If you just knew how people meddled with those certified parts etc.
Just get a subcontractor and make sure the contract moves responsibility forward well enough. And pocket the price difference. Of course the price is smaller and schedule tighter than what would be required for doing things properly.
If something crashes and burns, blaim the subcontractor that was legally bound to do something to prevent it through the contract.
Just in case someone has been wondering about what the fuss about supply chains is really about.
Sorry, today it is all about efficiency (aka destroying resilience as much as possible).
It would be extremely enjoyable to watch things crash and burn in real time if it was the C suite desperately trying to fix things instead of underpaid overworked employees.
Yeah it was pretty annoying to set up things local network only. Browsing through tutorials. Pulling device keys and installing custom offline libraries etc.
And manually setting the rules.
When manufacturer provides smartphone app that works out of the box.
Actually it took only something like 3-4 evenings in total. Including setting up multiple devices and refining rules.
But now worst that could happen is that our underfloor heating is on higher setting when electricity price is high. If the connections have been down so long that pre-fetched Nordpool prices get outdated.
Being honest the kids today probably don't have the autonomy required for making any $$$$ calls within the projects.
And even if they did, the companies probably laid off all the experienced people who could have passed their experience forward long time ago.
And even they did not lay off everyone, the days and requirements (KPI etc) would probably be structured in a way that passing the information would be extremely challenging.
A snake eating it's own tail and we are the ones forced to watch and experience it.
Why would no-one been able to realise that there was single point of failure?
Like there would not be capable people able to identify if they were assigned to investigate.
In places where there are KPIs, risks of people just not noticing something extremely important that lies outside the KPIs is pretty obvious. And that is exactly what the management is telling everyone to do.
Ah the good old unwritten rules of workplace like publicly shame any superior and find out really soon. No matter how factually correct or on point you are.
The superiors making constantly exactly similar jokes on others below them is just them showing how they are untouchable. And the meaner the jokes by them, the less capable they probably are to handle things if tables turn.
I sure hope people at least got good laughs from the email. The memories seem at least to be warm.
People like convenience. Who cares aböut educating oneself when there is something already available bundled to os. Just click yes.
Imagine if people had to do any research to find suitable option. Onedrive might not be that popular after all.
But self hosting? There are serious caveats. Lot of unknown knowns for someone who barely understands that cloud means files are stored to someone else's computer. Redundancy, equipment MTTF, testing regularly that backups actually work, ...
What about skipping the myth about people absolutely needing someone micromanaging from the top to begin with?
Just give people authority and responsibility of their decisions. But this would threaten the C suite when it would spread within workers more broadly so just kill it with fire. Or with scrum of scrum of scrum of scrum of scrum of scrum of scrum of scrum of ...
Imagine venture capital firms pouring billions to AI related stuff and reality hits.
They will definitely find ways to get their money back. Preferably from taxpayers like the financial institutions usually do. Unless it is funded mostly by regular people. Then they'll just need to deal with the pain.
Just check retractionwatch and spot people who were labelled as exceptional talents and got a lot of funding and nice careers.
And then remove the possibility of retractions and the whole peer review process and let a chatbot calculate probabilities from undeclared (wonder why..) datasets and just step up the coercion until people just consider everything that is being calculated valid. What could go wrong?
It is not the things one is able to spot but things that might slip through that matters more than one wants to admit.
And this is why I think this has a point.
The profit motive is out there. Any company would extract everything possible for next quarter profits and left smoking ruins behind. Unless there are people smart enough to spot it and brave enough to call it out.
Imagine for example someone with conflicts of interest. Get sacked or do the free work part just as we say. All they need to do is align incentives and rest happens probably automatically.
At the same time those companies sure do gaslighting you as much as possible and promise a lot of things about redundancy etc.
In other words one would need to have a lot of time to research backgrounds for each marketing promise when all important details are behind an opaque wall.
What they say about repeating lies enough and they become...
And what points out the most to me is that these comments about not trusting some arrangements pop out every time after some catastrophic has already happened. And then time passes and marketing promises dogpile on top of old warnings and another person finds out the hard way. There is just too much money and incentives behind misleading people to desired direction.
Trello was really useful tool for complex chaotic task planning, management and tracking, keeping people up to date with tasks, assigning tasks to people etc.
Now there are lot of unnecessary clicks everywhere thanks to the UI redesign. Now I need to reconsider a lot of workflows.
Bit like taking one of the most useful rock tools and replace it with completely different tool while destroying all the existing tools and denying use of the old tool completely. Not an evolution path inevitably leading to microprocessors in my honest opinion.
I assume it is logically impossible to focus on multiple things as long as all the core loops rotate around control and monitoring.
So it basically boils down on what the C-suite is interested in and all other stuff is more or less abandoned because people on other projects need to beg audience from CEO erc who are fully invested in their pet projects.
So projects are fine as long as metrics look good. Too bad if there are any major blockers that would require authorisation but nobody will do that. Projects just struggle keeping metrics as good as possible until one day it is impossible and everything just starts imploding. And company axes the project. And when company has axed multiple projects the panic is getting real and they'll probably axe also multiple viable/promising projects just in case. Because losing one's face is not an option for higher ups. They'll rather burn the company down completely.
They could spend resources for keeping existing species alive through environmental protection stuff.
But nah, let's just pick the obviously easier task where a lot of resourcs will be thrown at.
And when humankind has messed everything up too bad, then just load as much people as possible to SpaceX rocket and start the countdown.
It keeps baffling me that with the state of engineering ability and material science know-how in 2024 hampering repairability would somehow translate into even thinner devices.
They probably use something like $100k+ jigs per assembly station in production to glue the things together that could also be cleverly designed assembly. Which would mean one could replace single part and not the only available module that "coincidentally" has all the expensive parts bundled in it. Like touch screen stuff for smartphones and soldering ram + SSD to laptops...
But on an other hand chasing as high revenues and profits ever possible would require the hampering repairability -part to be done as fully as possible....
The best receipe for disaster projects usually is to not do the basics correctly. The easiest way to stack things in a way that no matter what talented individuals do everyone is doomed.
I've seen in industrial engineering projects that some principles similar to be found in agile manifesto are easily available but the management struggles to understand them and that is why someone simplifies the idea into lifecack with zero context that they are able to follow blindly. What could (not) go wrong?
What we know about complex projects (for example oasis of the seas cruise ship) is that you can have easily 1000 different companies working their own thing without significant issues as long as majority of basic things are done correctly from the beginning of the project until it finishes and there is enough resources to manage surprises and there is handful of people who know 24/7 what the status is with everything so they can check the big picture in under 30 minutes easily.
Just find a spot where a puddle can be formed. Then all you need is salt water and couple months time (reaction speed depends on temperature) and the sheet might have already tiny spot rusted through and any time water is introduced corrosion continues.
It is good that my car has assisted parking because it is impossible to get center of the parking spot manually. Looking out does not help because you can't see any ground within 2-3m unless you open the window fully and mirrors don't help because there are no straight lines in car side to help any alignment. And the reverse camera, huge barrel stretched to rectangle form.