"too US-focussed ... and often times ..."
Irony alert :-)
538 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Feb 2007
I've wondered about app download sizes before. For example, Facebook's last iOS update was about 200 meg if I remember rightly. Seeing as it's all online content, WTF is in there to make it that big?
I realise the answer is probably 'all the spyware' but it would be interesting to know what goes in there.
It actually looks and feels like the kind of space-age 21st-century that was enthusiastically shown to families in the 1970s, along with the self-cleaning laundry basket, automatic lawn mover, robot butler and flying car.
I'm fed up of having to move my lawn myself* all the time, I can't wait until it does it itself!
* I say myself, my robot monkey butler actually does it.
Bezel-less screens, wireless charging and on screen home buttons. Wow, that's so innovative - where do they get their ideas from?
To be fair, during the presentation they didn't claim to be first with any of those things (even though the X doesn't have an on-screen home button).
In addition to some basic UI tweaks, the updated design comes with a paginated sign-in where you enter your username on the first page and a credential (password, probably) on the second."We've done a lot of testing of this design and our telemetry shows that people are able to sign in with a notably higher success rate using this approach," Microsoft notes.
Wait, so it's: type username ... wait for page to reload ... type password?
I don't get how that would yield such a supposed improvement in sign-in success?
Imagine if there was an iPhone or Andoid phone that was HALF as rugged and had HALF as much battery life as these ancient Nokias.
While Timmy and Jony continue being obsessed with thinness, that's never going to happen to the iPhone.
I wonder if anyone ever thinks, "You know what I hate about this iPhone I have? It's so fucking THICK."
Meanwhile, the one device that would actually benefit from being thinner is the Watch, yet the focus is on the ability to put a new strap on it.
"That's more an example of poor form design."
As well as the intended gist of my post, yes it was indeed. See this reply for clarification.
"However, the other possible problem is that the company's web form didn't highlight the error for him"
Yep, this was about 1999/2000 time and the site had already been in place for a year so the conventions for such things weren't really established, and I think it was something along the lines of an onSubmit() function checking each field in turn and throwing up an alert box like "Please check the blah blah field". Of course as well being poor validation (compared to modern standards at least) this led to 'chase the error' situations.
I went on to be one of the developers on the same site and we got to redevelop it from scratch, so of course it became awesome and we received zero phone calls after that ;-)
That change in attitude at the end there, reminds me of a time way back when, when I did first-line website support for a financial company.
Guy rings up shouting and screaming that the website is broken and it won't accept his correct data. So I suggest I bring up the same page on my screen and we go through it, field by field. We get about halfway down, to some date fields (date moved into house or something).
Me: Ok so let's fill in these date, month and year fields, what values are you entering in there?
Guy: 31...
Me: Yep. Now the month?
Guy: 9...
Me: Umm, can I just stop you there
To be fair, once he'd twigged he was quite apologetic and was grateful for finally getting his application through.
Are you being serious? If you are, do you not realise that you can type whatever format you want into it, that's why it's called 'Custom'. The lists in the box are just suggestions and examples and custom ones you have already created for that workbook.
A condescending reply on a tech forum? That must be a first.
But anyway, another +1 here for the format the OP mentioned. I was surprised when they let me use it in a reporting function I made for an admin tool recently.
My company's website doesn't have any sort of password meter. I always thought them to be a bit suspect at the best of times.Nor does it limit choice of password characters.
What it does do though, is force a password length of 10 characters or more
It's about time we got rid of annoying character restrictions and focussed more on password length. The number of sites which still accept 6-character passwords is amazing.
like Mr Robot
I find Mr. Robot one of the more reasonable representations of 'computery stuff' in TV and films, to be honest. Especially when compared to this kind of stuff which almost makes me want to puke and laugh at the same time.
The makers of these things have to strike a balance between accuracy and fitting in with the flow of the plot. Viewers don't particularly want to sit and wait while he solves various missing dependencies and compiler errors.
When I watch medical things, I've no idea what they're talking about most of the time, but it sounds 'about right' and fits in with the flow of things. Maybe doctors watch that kind of thing and say "there's no WAY they'd use 50ml of X there! What idiots! You'd use 30 max, then step it up in increments of 5ml per hour whilst monitoring vitals."
"I have YET to see ANYONE on the job who is learning something job related from social media bullshit."
Via my Twitter feed I found a series of YouTube videos on Machine Learning from a Google developer, which I started watching and have since found an application for in my job.