Posts by Ideasource 327 publicly visible posts • joined 9 Oct 2022
Because it's the only way the best of experiences to ever exist. In the legal gray for any one to mirror improve and tweak to their own use.
Also helps to give modern access to those with very little pocket money.
Because nothing off-the-shelf is a good enough until adjusted to specific circumstances.
i dont want to barumpumpumpum to a facist melody. yuck!
screw that. I'll never be a drummer boy Folæciomadoré Tureia Christīanàdo. You hear me?.. NEVER!!!!
I like jazz/blues way too much for that. Not that I found the existing tune very appealing for that matter.
eh, go figure.
nope. its refers to an actioned exodus trend stemming from internet gossip channels commonly grouped and called upon as "social media platforms" that have gummed up the pipeworks with all the ills of society available right outside your front door.
ahh "Internet"...
... Now with 2 exponential scoops of stinky social garbage and a sprinkling of mouse turd droppings in almost every box. find the comment/post section in almost any linguring area to get your complimentary mouse droppings today.
act now and get the free neural rototiller service pack 3 today.
or not. and why not naught? well because. that's why not naught. duh.
Regarding the odd capitalization, speech to text and fat fingers on a touch screen during leisure time internet discussion are just nit Important enough of a pursuit to spend all the time proofreading and adjusting to that fine degree.
I'm fine With Individuals negotiating on one time payment fir one piece of work.
But I'm not comfortable with is one person restricting everyone else once it has escape privacy into the larger world.
Methodologies and concepts of economics are tools.
Legal concept give weight by threat of force are tools.
People helping directly absent the inefficiencies of monetizing should be enshrined rather then curtailed.
Getting paid is only a means to an end. The more ends that can be achieved through more direct means and motivations the more Independent people become.
If we are ever going to redeem all this technology to Make people more self sufficient and no longer have to go to last resort of commerce with all the social drawbacks of Capitalistic commerce Modeled after war-games brings, attacking developments like this is sabotage.
Capitalism works great to spur innovation in an absence of a concept of IP.
Capitalism plus IP creates the malignancy.
It makes it almost impossible to honorably boycott and roll your own solutions to help your community.
It discourages fellowship and compassion in the general population. It Encourages sustainment of problems to prevent solution. Like treating a wound while keeping it open and restricting the closing of the wound from other efforts to maintain treatment..
I value people over tools.
Tools are there take the wear and tear to relieve people.
I don't think capitalism is bad, I just don't think it should be elevated to God-like status of importance. It should be allowed to fail when it gets in the way of the greater good.
It gets unfair protection as a methodology that places it as more important then the people who are restricted to allow it to operate.
Like a language shifted version of object worship.
The modern equivalent of "the golden calf"
Tools are supposed to be interchangeable as fits situation.
Stop worshipping the tools. There are much more efficient solutions more appropriate to task that are being sabotaged by Forcing everything to restrictive capitalism.
A more dynamic approach is more useful.
Any process grown out of range becomes malignant.
I just want to trim capitalislm back to A healthy secondary concern to keep it symbiotic Onto those who are forced suffer artificial restriction and loss of option to help Themselves and others directly to prop up capitalism.
You're putting commerce ahead of larger life outside commerce.
If They wanna play that game That's fine but they shouldn't be allowed to limit those who aren't. Or nothing will ever graduate the commercial gauntlet to be enshrined in the public domain for good all of humanity and aid in reducing dependency on commercial activity.
If commercial activity steals the whole world instead if being used to recycle greed into engines to serve all, Might as well shut down the whole mudddy mess and be just as miserable as a species without all the fuss and restrictions.
Copyright should have never been applied to non commercial activity in the first place.
There's one thing to be bound by commercial interests By competing commercially, but Real life outside the commercial compromise Ought to be less restricted in respect to its greater importance as the larger frame.
Those outside the arena of profit seeking for Ought not to be limited by interest for commercial profit.
getting accused of cheating in a game you never were a part of to be bound by.
I just see an artistic depiction of two lamps.
Seemed to be a nod back to the stocking leg lamp joke on "a Christmas story"
While also taking a note from ballet where people often represent non people objects within the scene.
What an odd world we live in that People must apologize to others for how the imagination of those others ran to panic.
As if we all had the power to restrain or prevent Someone else's interpretive imagination in the first place. And are so held accountable for their disturbed thoughts.
It's a mad mad mad world, afterall
I suspect the chinese are not chasing profit.
I suspect they're wisely sacrificing profit to enable greater Usable physical results.
Money is merely stored potential to Influence other humans until successfully applied to gain a useful physical situation.
Until exchanged it's just numbers on a leaderboard that might be exchanged for something directly usable.
I suspect they're skipping the middle man, and cutting out the drain that is profit to obtain results more directly.
After all , in fair exchange that accounts for everyone affected involved there is no profit.
Profit is not earned, Otherwise it would be a wage. Profit is won.
Human made the decision to to run the risk of driving with that feature. Human knows they are responsible for what their property does in any way it effects others and the property of others. Human should receive vehicular manslaughter as there's no intent and it was an accident but Somebody died from his property and poor judgment operatimg under his drivers license.
Delete has always meant removing obvious reference.
Reality continues unabated to demand and enforce that you cannot destroy information.You can merely obscure it or transform it, But it will still exist somehow in some form to be potentially uncovered and understood.
Fundamental aspects of reality. information cannot be agreed into a nonexistence. It cannot be litigated into nonexistent.
All these attempts actually accomplish is tricking humans into ignoring reality with spotty results across individuals
It is also reasonable to expect that Using a third party platform Will eventually leak your important data.
Reasonably, no one should be a surprised , And everyone should have been anticipating such things working it into their business strategies. Reasonably that should be the risk of those who choose to trust a third party.
It is unreasonable to expect any real degree of control over anything out of your own personal hands.
My point is that What is reasonable was sacrificed as compromise for promoting commercial activity over public networks a long time ago. A little late for For reasonable now. We sent reasonable to the gallows a long time ago. And it was quite profitable.
We now have a system of economic AND industry dependencies on framwork of specific exception to what is reasonable.
trying to Bring reasonable back into the mix just might crash the whole system.
Which i'm fine with.
But I suspect many others are not and overwhelmed by the implications to cognitive dissonance.
Since capitalistic competition has succeeded in innovating to the point of nothing new to innovate. We should graduate printing technology to the public domain.
The interfaces of capitalism were only ever justified by how they spur innovation.
And for everything that can be done then logically eventually you're going to reach the limits of practical application.
Time to turn printing into a public utility. And let all that manpower and economic activity go to spurring innovation and somewhere else that is still more primitive and so needing further development.
And so redeem the benefits and gained efficiencies for all of society. It's to run the gauntlet to completion. It's proven itself .
time to take the IP out of the commercial pressure cooker and unleash fully for casual use with access as assumable as the air we breathe.
Or is all effort to be for nothing in perpetuity?
As the title says
Game of thrones the home game.
That's what I call politics.
Seems fitting. Even when you think you're winning, then that just means things have gotten even more dangerous for your precarious position.
Meanwhile there's lots of people discreetly living their lives while other people aren't watching to complain, enjoying much more peace and perceptions of happiness in life despite their varying physical circumstances and hardships.
But I suppose to the chronically unsatisfiable, it's provides an endless source of distracting drama to keep them from sulking into unending depression. Or so I imagine is the appeal.
That's not a about ego, that's about saving physical effort to let your tools do most of the work for you.
Just as to dig a hole using a shovel instead of your fingers is about saving personal physical effort and not so much about ego.
Ego would be more like the person who pays for flashy looking wheel rims that create a visual effect while driving, but never gets to see them because no one else drives their car.
I'm driving SUV because if traffic is bad or the store is busy I can pull over and take a nap conveniently without being cramped and then continue when the scene is more pleasant to me.
Taking a nap on the way to somewhere without a vehicle to hide in resulted in waking up to ambulances and paramedics asking if I'm okay, and then I have to think fast to say all the right words to make sure the city can't bill me for wasting my time.
I'm 6' 5" in height. First thing I do is get rid of those stupid back seats.
On a humorous note.
Picture this.
All the politicians show up for work
And find that nobody pays attention to them anymore.
Every time they tried communicate anything everyone says no thank you and walks away including their own subordinates.
That would be hilarious.
They would fume and makes words all day to no avail.
That is if they ever stopped arguing with each other to notice that no one was paying attention.
A fantasy I know.
When gambling for an outcome with external forces and entities, is poor sportsmanship and irresponsible thinking to do not accept the possibility of failure as a natural consequence of choice of effort l.
It would be more honest if they would take responsibility for that loss as natural fallout of trying to control the uncontrollable.
When it comes to winning outcomes in this world, governments are spoiled little babies attitude-wise.
Always blaming others for the failure of their predicted strategies as if they were entitled to their goals rather than honestly regarding themselves high stakes gamblers trying to suspend reality in favor of a dream.
I just wish they would take their losses with dignity rather than lash out.
Its sets a very bad example for humanity.
What if we all treated each other that way?
There would be no peace or love in this world at all.
If they wouldn't create secrets in the first place they wouldn't have this problem.
accountability for being sneaky and underhanded is broken and excepted for government because everyone's scared to to take them off the pedestal.
Which is reasonable enough.
You piss them off they send goons with guns as well as weaponizing general society against you through poisoning of records.
The common brutality and avoidance of natural consequence ought to be considered horrific.
The ability of humans to normalize unfair treatment and avoidance of responsibility regarding natural consequence of methodology regarding deception/secrecy is truly impressive.
Might makes right still remains the defacto backing of government power.
Fox News anchors pretty funny too.
It looks like it's over the top dry satire something akin to Monty Python, but they seem to actually believe it.
That's hilarious.
The gathering of fools as they expound on their own foolishness.
Quite the show.
There's no shortage of entertainment in American politics.
It's a place where reality is not recognized and so anything goes.
It really is a shame they don't apply their flair for dramatic fiction to fantasy literature.
Operating in a more appropriate sector they might become best sellers and acclaimed authors
Oh but they do put up pictures of death and p*** by default.
If there's an abortion clinic then by default someone will be on the corner displaying grotesque pictures of death.
If there is clothing to be sold, soft porn in the form purposefully and sexually excitable imagery is par for the course.
The definitions of what is porn and what isn't slide conveniently to support exceptions to recognition for convenience of other pursuits.
Apparently the majority of people are dependent upon misdirection to give themselves permission to do what they're going to do anyway.
Firstly I don't have a problem with p***. And I don't value individual human bodies as much as I value individual consciousnesses and I don't believe consciousness even develops until a person is 7 or 8 years old. Until then they are wired for mimicry.
Not to say that I can't form an emotional attachment with a child . I have nieces and nephews but I helped to raise during their formative years but I do consciously recognize they they had not yet diverged to become a person yet. And my attachment was mostly to my own personal vision of the future for them.
Now they have diverged enough to shatter that vision and so replace it with their emerging divergence from external expectation to self-authored New direction aka the person.
How do we prevent children from discovering the real world and so protect and preserved their innocence?
The answer is you can't.
Either they'll find it on their own, or larger reality will find them.
The dark web is just the original internet in which the civilized areas are islands connect to each other with blinders to the outside as a more recent program of censorship running within of a pre-existing larger frame.
Eventually someone looks any other direction but the narrow accepted one and there's no going back. They are instinctually compelled as humans to learn about the world around them.
It's often times turns out to be illegal to live within your means.
Hell I'd love to just set up a tent somewhere during the nice parts of the year and Bank everything I would have thrown into the trash through rent , to put a down payment on a house.
I homeownership would be much more achievable there's space for set aside for people to live within their personal physical means so that they could save up to graduate to homeownership.
And for those who would decide to live in a tent or whole life this would free up more of their income for spending at local shops and so feed the local economy.
But there is no legal means to do so without involving other people's means.
There is no Commonwealth here.
Shareholders.
High class grifters.
We can fix it.
If we capoed returns at 200%, and then the have stock automatically transfers to the employees.
Investor still gets a return to encourage further investment and employees get a fair return on their investment of labor attention and participation in the practice of authoritative hierarchy.
This would encourage small single owner business, while discouraging the development of big business with it's disgusting tendency to steal political power and representation from the people.
Retool society to serve the living.
Anything essential to basic life ought to be government provided. After all people ought to get something back in return for all the work and time distraction it takes to believe in government the concept of country follow the laws self-restriction. Remembering all that nonsense is quite the chore.
Restricting one's own potential to meet society's convenience is wearing.
Being a "good" citizen is a full-time job with no off time it deserves fair compensation in return in the form of basic securities.
For everything else capitalism works fine because if nobody actually needs it then people can actually afford to collectively cut off businesses that displeased them and so choke them out of existence.
Boycotts have little chance of doing their job of forcing compromise from commercial operations if people can't afford to to effectively isolate and starve businesses that displease their communities.
With government provided basic necessities, boycotting is no longer any danger unto the individuals owning these businesses as it will not put them or their employees starving into the streets.
After necessity it's all just points on a leaderboard and the safety concerns are absolved.
Citations are overrated.
Stack enough invalid citations Referencing each other and no one will notice the difference unless they directly tested the idea itself.
It's really gotten quite out of control in the world of publication and citation.
Since you have to directly test a concept to really know you might as well skip right to it or admit the validity is unknowable until personal experimentation has concluded.
Supporting a mostly useless platform is easy.
It booted up and still sucks everything is to be as expected go drink some coffee and watch a movie.
Administering a useful Network built on a useful platform towards users, that's more difficult because the versatility and user mods to be useful is what creates the work for the administrator.
Yes but general considerations can be wrong.
Anything generally considered to be good should be treated as a warning flag that there is a general push to avoid further examination within a specific situation.
That should be taken with suspicion and used to motivate specific examination and exceptional exploration for alternatives.
These general goods rely upon a lot of assumed goals that may or may not be in play.
Some things seem good only until you examine the underlying philosophies and methodologies and goals. finding ou disagree with some of the foundational assumptions and so invalidates the entire model.
Undeclared assumptions can make abstract wishes seem to be facts
Yep and then we will imitate theirs and then some third party will imitate both and in the processes of imperfect imitation innovation occurs.
Sometimes those innovations become recognized as massive discoveries and turning points in history.
May the imitating of each other continue the inventive process and bring forth more discoveries unto all.
If deep fake nudes become prevalent enough then it will discredit any genuine nudes.
This is helpful to society because it'll break the social mechanism by which leaked nudes cause social harm.
If everybody becomes casually discrediting towards nudes out of suspicion of fakery they lose their power and we no longer have to pay the overhead of effort in focus to moderate them to protect living people's reputations.
Oh they'll just go buy a large bottle of flavor extract.
Most of them are around 180 proof and require no ID.
Or they will steal it.
Once you try to pay for it and are turned down it doesn't feel the same as other stealing under the insults of age discrimination.
You insult someone directly enough times and they stop caring about what you think of them as a result.
Same is true of teenagers viewing themselves being treated in a discriminatory fashion.
Everyone enjoys giving their oppressor a failed expectation.
They are systematically oppressed, even if it's a socially justified oppression. And so all the downsides and reactant expressions of the oppressed come into play.
Silly guy , I was referring to "development" the function
Not "Developing Country" the socially compromised term used as a fabricated permission system within the limited context of international squabbles.
every Nation. every person, every creature, in every situation is constantly developing until it develops into non-existence.
They will continue to develop until they develop non-existence.
I remember when I first stole high fives from a TV show.
Also remember how I stole language from others around me.
Then there's how I stole smiling from my parents.
Hell I stole every bit of understanding I have from the environment that surrounds me.
Or maybe this is all just a case of the wrong word because I'm pretty sure the appropriate word is not "stole" but learned.
The Chinese may have learned from the world around them but don't we all.
It's okay for a a developing entity to mimic the expressions of others.
In fact it's absolutely necessary normal and healthy.
The commercial world disregards real world sensibilities and operates as a sort of exception from reality lala land in which reality is suspended in favor of a law enforced game made of fabricated from imagination and willful desire of its authors.
So if anything the Chinese might be cheating by American rules, but if mimicry without consent is stealing then lock every Infant up, kill the learning process and and revert humans to dumb animals.
For not willing to do that then you have to admit that it's not stealing.
Either it's b******* that people made up or it's real independent of cultural and legal Fabrications.
Well you can teach a person how to draw a line, you can't teach people Art.
Well at least not directly.
The difference between a collection of shapes and colors or contrast and curvature and art is the hype that the artist comes up with on the fly to justify their work.
You can create artifacts all day but to make it art in the eyes of others, you or someone else needs to broadcast a b******* spiel to others to make it seem like more than it is and thus you have created art.
That's a creative inventive on the fly process that's more about social engineering than it is to tangible product creation.
What's the difference between art and non-art? The twisting of the viewers perception.
If you grow too big for your britches you become the biggest target.
It seems fair to me that those that game higher success through social renown in the commercialized world fall by the same lack of discretion and restraint.
Stay small and discreet or expose yourself as the bigger treasure pot to plunder.
Helping to provide overturn and prevent entrenchment.
Those who climb higher encourage ever larger more sophisticated attacks through their visibility.
This seems to be basic natural Dynamics maintaining independent of human fantasy.
Is anybody actually surprised?
Copyright WAS intended incentivize human effort.
that intent has shifted.
copyright current intent is to to provide for unfair compensation so that more effort need not be applied to new invention by holding everyone else's potential hostage to yester-time's already fairly compensated efforts.
A officialy declared intent can be and in this dynamic proven false by cumulative experience across the last two decades that is counter to that declaration.
It is not uncommon for official wording to be purposely deceptive regarding intent to indirectly gain an advantage in another related direction.
That's the nature of politics.
Santa Claus already is the biggest criminal in the world.
He's a master of trespass, sneaking in by way of the chimney.
Everything he brings avoids import tax so he's also an international smuggler.
Anything he brings with the brand name on it is copyright infringement and counterfeit as the elves reproduce it without any regard for intellectual property.
Santa Claus psychologically groom's children to two materialism which we all know is a state of artificial psychological deficit that is easily exploited throughout the rest of life by apathetic money grubbers and social con artists.
But the founders of the USA are also criminals. Guilty of high treason and they are held in high regard at least by many in the USA.
Social example in the USA shows that being a criminal doesn't matter if people like what you do.
The UK as well.
For the example
Robin Hood was a fictional story of a famous criminal that was loved by many and is still loved today.
Well how's this for a compromise then.
A Luddite market, but you're free to assemble lesser quality solutions for your private use.
That way you were still free to exercise your choice to pursue lesser quality solutions in your life, but the rest of the world is insulated from your influence so that so as to avoid any unfairness unto others, stemming from your preference.
If you're going to depend on the collective efforts of others then your opinion and desires are only worth whatever fraction you represent to the whole.
If you can insulate your personal desires from dependence on others supplementing you then it becomes appropriate for others to leave you to it.
Well the initial viewing of anything is an on-the-fly interpretive construction made of previous associations, outside stimuli and a composite biased towards previous recognitions.
And it turns out that remembering things is not a reversal but is the same process of creativity by the brain every experience of memory is CSI like reimagining blurred by experiences occurring after the initial real world action or scene that the brain is attempting to remember
The initial vision itself is a useful imagination loosy based on external stimuli.
But eyes do not see like cameras do.
Eyes send all sorts of crazy data that must be curated and selectively interpreted always with some degree of inaccuracy or loss of information, as well as creative assumptions by the brain to render an acceptable experience to the conscious mind and so render the experience of seeing it.
I'm curious and have a question
do you have a hard time remembering what things look like in order to visually pattern match what's your looking for with what's around you?
I always have to visualize what things look like before I I have a pattern to recognize when looking for things.
So it's hard to imagine being able to find anything without being able to visualize.
Is it literally out of sight out of mind?
Do you have to reevaluate everything every time by testing them physically to know what they can do and thus what they are?
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2025
