Re: Socialism is bad, mmkay?
I think they just mistranslated the truth of it, "a multis sume, uni da."
538 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Nov 2022
"Oh it is easy to understand: MS don't give a shit about security."
That part I can understand. I'd fully expect IE, Edge, Outlook and whatever else MS come up with, to not only allow but actively encourage people to spread crud, and Exchange to merrily distribute it far and wide.
What I can't understand is real mail clients allowing such attachments, or admins of real mail servers allowing them to pass through their servers as attachments.
Yes, I've in the past had users complain that their "file didn't get through" to their recipient and inspection showed they'd sent a .LNK instead of the file. Yes, I'm one of those who bolts things down before putting them into production. Unfortunately 4x2 battens and baseball bats aren't allowed to be used in user education programmes these days :-(
"I do not think it means what you think it means."
I don't know, it seems quite succinctly defined.
"Must be nice to work at a company where issues are solved by throwing money at it."
Throwing money at the wrong thing(s), then saving money by erecting signs instead of getting an electrician to put in a dedicated feed for the servers.
I've done that at several customer premises - nothing as drastic as server power, just power to sensor lights in entry corridors to save people breaking their necks if they needed to come in after dark. Massive "DO NOT SWITCH OFF!" signs in bold red lettering. You think people noticed?
"So…er… it was the crane’s fault?"
If we could read the insurance claim form, I've no doubt it would read something like this;
"A perfectly clear path with no obstructions, when suddenly a crane lept out from behind the bushes, we simply didn't have time to stop or swerve!"
... I have "fond" (for the most negative connotations of that word) memories of RAM issues back in the late '70s, from so-called "alpha particle degeneration."
I remember back then there being a strong push towards static RAM for critical implementations, but marketing soon overcame the will of the greybeards.
Cast your mind back to the early days of the 'net, when lazy developers defined fixed dimensions for all objects on a page.
Got a higher resolution monitor than the developer had? Tough, you'll just have to put up with a page that occupies a quarter or your screen.
Same thing here. There's no shortage of methods to elegantly scale an app's output and make it layout-agnostic - but there are far too many developers who refuse to think about anything more than their own environment.
Write about all the top-500 companies you've walked past or viewed the web sites of.
Give it a 5-paragraph detailed description of what you did, including bending over to pick up a 5-cent coin.
Write another page about precisely what you think about "AI," its current state, and how those who use it should be the first ones replaced.
Once upon a time concise brevity was appreciated by recruiters who valued their time. Now it's time to go in the other direction, over-feed the bugger.
"Is it just badly configured, staff not adequately trained, or the normal Microsoft cruft?"
Once upon a time, Microsoft found a piece of string and discovered that if they added some sticky tape to it, they could sell it for a profit.
Since then, tonnes of sticky tape and even more string have been added to the "product," to the point where not even their most experienced programmers (which these days means they've worked at Microsoft for all of three months) can figure out what the "product" does.
So of course, they just keep piling more on, to preserve the perceived value they've brainwashed their customers into believing.
Given that "AI" frequently (exclusively?) operates in the realm of a late-stage Alzheimer's sufferer, is anyone really surprised by this finding?
Just as you wouldn't ask your nonagenarian grandfather for such advice, you shouldn't trust an "AI" for anything more than casual amusement.
I know several people who swear by ChatGPT, preferring it over legwork through traditional web searches. And the more incorrect ChatGPT's answer is, the more adamant these people are that it's correct. Gospel-like, even.
Mr. Methane is happy that he can now return to a peaceful life without having a satellite tracking his every move.
"The question is when people really need 25+ Gb/s links in each room in the foreseable future"
It's about building a future-proof infrastructure when the opportunity presents itself, rather than wasting time and money on re-building everything every few years.
Look at how much money NBNCo has wasted re-building the network in Australia because HRH King Rupert decreed once upon a time that "FTTN is more than good enough."
Do it once, do it properly.
BTW, I'm pretty sure that "room" was mistranslated from "abode" - as in, a fibre link to each flat (apartment) in a block, not a link to each room therein.
Paradoxically, those pushing for it are precisely the ones whose jobs would be most suited for replacement by "AI."
Seeing a team of bots playing daily Bullshit Bingo could even become a popular televised sporting event (hey, if they can classify breakdancing as a sport, it's open season).
Chinese companies are heading their own way, innovating with software and using ever more home-grown tech - which might not be quite up to the level of western technologies at the moment, but it's (1) cheap, (2) available, and (3) highly likely to evolve beyond what the western players are offering.
Faces, noses, etc...