Re: ships off Port of Seattle data for $6M
It would be interesting to find out who precisely bought this data if the transaction did take place.
My bet's on some scummy mainsleaze operation.
382 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Nov 2022
I suspect that in the not too distant future, VMware will be spun/sold off just like what happened with Motorola after Google acquired it.
I highly doubt it'll ever get back to mass acceptance though; the well has well and truly been poisoned and is now glowing fluorescent green.
Surely I can't be the only person wondering just how much of the movie If You Were the Last is going on here?
Yeah, I don't think the photographer trying to earn a living by licencing stock photos would've had any input into - or access to - SolarWinds source code.
More likely nobody bothered to review the code after that fateful week years ago, when they had a work experience kid in at the office to write the product for them.
You would think so, wouldn't you?
Sadly we've gone straight past 1984.
"SQL server was a bought in product."
That explains why unlike most other M$ products, SQL Server actually works.
Give them time though; they've already mastered the art of stuffing massive bloat into it, it won't be too long before bits start falling off.
NT was a brilliant product when originally written by ex-DEC developers, now look at it.
There are plenty of open source replacements, and even more commercial (but nowhere near as expensive as Exchange) replacements. The problem (if you can call it that) is that there is so much choice - just as with Linux, there's no one single product that people can point to and say "there 'tis."
AD implementation in Linux is only ever a few apt (or whatever your distribution's package manager is) lines away; the first time I implemented it in a production environment was back in the mid 2000s.
HR...
First they took job application processing away from the people who knew the business and gave it to external agencies who knew nothing about it.
Now they've taken the task away from the semi-literate minions working at the agencies and given it to very flaky automated processes.
... and they wonder why their new hires are completely useless and need to be trained as if they'd just come out of high school?
On my own computers, yes... On my family's computers, yes...
On my customers' computers though, which run proprietary software that will only work on a recent version of Windows, the only choice is to get a massive mallet and knock it into submission.
To make things even more interesting, the specialised test equipment they use only runs on old (<= XP) versions of Windows (insert facepalm icon here).
1. NEVER use a Mickey$oft account to set up 'Doze; always create a local one (there're plenty of references online on how to do this, even with the "Home" flavour thereof).
2. ALWAYS use a reputable de-bloating script and third-party uninstaller to get rid of the bloatware, both at installation and after every forced update.
My first response would be "well derr, nobody's going to fall for this!" - but then the realisation hits that beside actual IT professionals, there'll be countless middle and upper management types who have admin access (at least to their computers if not to the domain), who appear to be genetically pre-dispositioned to clicking on obviously malicious links.
"So unless Kaspersky are going to embed US Gov in the code change and update lifecyle the offer's worth nothing."
Huawei already did this in the UK, granting UK GovCo (along with representatives of other nations) full access to their development code - and yet still the politicians snubbed them. When you're dealing with politics, logic goes right out the window.
Up to and including XP, you'd be offered "Start Windows with last known good configuration" in the event of a boot sequence failure. In *nix land, Grub keeps copies of old kernels and boot scripts and allows you to similarly revert to something which actually works.
Newer versions of Windows though, following Microsoft's decree of "users are too stupid to manage things," simply steamroll through, no matter what, at full speed towards the introduced brick wall.
Given the number of snapshots being taken left, right and centre, surely it shouldn't be that difficult to implement a failsafe boot process? Or is this going to be their major selling point for "Recall?"