Good point
《What it lacks is the kind of experience that comes with having a body and living in reality.》
A good point. How does one fully define "pain" to a piece of software - for a human a bloody good whack will do it. :)
More seriously pain and more importantly its perception or experience is quite complicated. Ticklishness might be interesting - heaven only knows what these systems make of "tickle your fancy."
Humour in its many forms defeats a good many humans so I imagine a fairly bleak machine interpretation of "black humour" or even the notorious English dry humour which confounds more than a few septics.
The question of reality (which according to physicists ain't what it used to be :) is probably more of a challenge. We take a lot of the world we live in for granted but the whole humungous body of science is just our mere scratching at the surface of that world. I assume we exist at relative ease in such a complicated world partly because we are a product of it.
The bar graph in the article from top to bottom is pretty good rank ordering of least to most useful. Hard to imagine what use a plumber would have for AI - a 1/2" shifter is much more useful tool (can even re-adjust attitude.:)
Some of the categories are a mixed lot - I suspect we could do better with fewer architects but with more engineers.
Poets like most callings (vocations), are usually fairly safe from the hazard of making a decent living so the risk of being replaced by a machine is infinitesmal. A professional Vogon poet "does not compute."