It's the kangaroos mate...
Yesterday the same research was quoted with local spin on the AU national broadcaster ABC self driving cars kangaroo research
The hours of dawn and dusk are when these marsupials ffaff about near roads - they are the dumbest creatures on two legs (H.sapiens excepted.) The article stated that the car computer had difficulty predicting the next move of the 'roo - not surprising the creature itself has no idea either.
A decent calibre Gatling gun mounted under the bonnet might be an effective remedy.
The major point of the ABC story was that FSD vehicles are eagerly anticipated by those who suffer from disabilities that prevent their driving themselves.
The story considered the technical problems and current legislative requirements.
But there is also a moral or ethical aspect the community and legislatures would need to consider.
Currently if you are in charge of a vehicle (even when computer assisted or on cruise control) you are responsible, at least in the first instance, for any injuries or damage the vehicle might inflict.
Now hypothetically if Helen Keller, who was both deaf and blind, got into her FSD vehicle alone and directed her vehicle to her destination, and in the course of the journey the vehicle collided with a mother and child on a pedestrian crossing - who is responsible? Elon Musk? (Yes, of course, but unfortunately you can only hang him once.)
The whole question is arguably in the same class as autonymous weapons.
If FSD vehicles were to become ubiquitous I shouldn't bother with a Gatling gun but go for an anti-tank weapon. :)