Re: Or for less money ...
And you’d lose a metric ton of IPC in the process. Which is the major selling point of the M-series chips.
18 publicly visible posts • joined 8 Jun 2022
…And you’re giving us shit for helping Ukraine retain their sovereignty?? Should we have just let Russia steamroll them?
Say what you want about representative democracy, it can be very ugly. I agree.
I’ll still take it every day of the week over communism. When one man consolidates power (with no checks/balances to prevent it in the first place), it never ends well. We had a demagogue. We voted the shitbag out of office. I truly wish China and Russia could do the same.
Intel’s “7nm” process (Intel 4/3) is supposed to generally be more on par with TSMC N4/N3. So SMIC’s N+2 7nm-class process won’t have near the transistor density. Granted, this all depends on Intel actually executing for once and releasing a pile of the damn transistors in the first place.
I’m personally more excited for the GAAFET (Intel’s silly-named, so-called “RibbonFET”) transistor architecture. I think it’s gonna be a bigger jump than planar to FinFET was.
Wake me up when we have 2D transistors with channels made of graphene being manufactured, with high yields, though.