Re: Of course it’s consistent about everything dealing you idiots
> Hmmmm? If it did display introspection and discuss itself would it be identifiable as human and or sentient machine or would that always be a subjective personal opinion/wish that as many as would agree, would agree to disagree, and treat as nonsensical fiction rather than revolutionary fact?
He, he. Well, I'm really not such a big fan of Turing tests and all that.
No, it's dumber than that. In fact I did try to ask Chat GPT to explain how it came up with an answer, and it was almost as if it had been programmed explicitly to swerve such questions. Which gave me a giggle, at least.
> You may like to consider such as OpenAI's ChatGPT have decided present day humanity is not yet ready for such a surreal revelation ...
I suspect there may be a simpler explanation.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
