For those unfamiliar with Qualcomm lawyers..
Qualcomm lawyers make statement that X is true. Not only is X no true but the people that the Qualcomm lawyers claim said X not only never said X, but never even thought X while on a drunken bender after a particularly successful "conference" in Las Vegas.
So again one of those cases where you know that X is not true because of exactly which very sleazy lawyers said it was true
Saying that, I would not believe a word SoftBank says either. But in a SoftBank v Qualcomm - He said, she said - it's Qualcomm lawyers for the Big Lie, every time.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
