Reply to post:

Twitter savaged by former security boss Mudge in whistleblower complaint

A random security guy

I realized that this was an intense piece of work for many reasons:

1. Mudge needed to keep proprietary information out.

2. Mudge needed to have attorneys go through every one of his claims and ensure that they were backed up by evidence he had or could ask for

3. This kind of filtering and wording takes time

4. One single false claim will cause him to lose credibility

5. He has stuck to claims which are easy to prove

6. He has used the complaint to go after a CEO who was a fool (bright technically but not in security, privacy, people skills, law, etc.)

The best thing for Twitter is to fire the CEO. Immediately.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon