Reply to post: Signing?

W3C's planned transition to HTTPS stymied by legacy laggards

tekHedd

Signing?

I suppose "signing" was never even considered as an option. Oh I'm sure it was *considered*...but rejected for reasons. And I'm sure those reasons were not at all political or nefarious.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon