Reply to post:

How a crypto bridge bug led to a $200m 'decentralized crowd looting'

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

The thing I don't get, is that the big thing about "smart contracts" is they are supposed to be code that has the full force of a legal contract. So, while this may not be what the author intended, it is allowed by the contract.

So why would the police or court be involved? No money was stolen, it was just taken legally by people who followed the letter of the contract which allowed them to do that.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon