Securing comms
2018: "The Five Eyes nations have told the tech industry to help spy agencies by creating lawful access solutions to encrypted services – and warned that governments can always legislate if they don't."
https://www.theregister.com/2018/08/31/five_eyes_2018_meeting_encryption_terrorist_content/
Various people have been put in place to implement it. Pritti Patel in the UK, Peter Dutton in Australia etc:
https://twitter.com/pritipatel/status/1180195336490557442
"Discussing the dangers of end-to-end encryption with close allies AG Barr and @PeterDutton_MP at the US @TheJusticeDept today. We can not let tech firms design platforms that give serious criminals & terrorists the advantage."
Obviously "serious criminals and terrorists" didn't cut the crust, so she's switched to pedos as a way to bypass the privacy right.
2019 we got the Ian Levy/Crispin Robinson proposal to give GCHQ a second key to all encrypted comms. Every time an encrypted session is created, GCHQ would get notified and a key so they can listen in. Oh fook off. You lot are more loyal to 5eyes that Britain. If Barr had told you to spy on Brits for Russia, you lot would have done it.
https://www.securityweek.com/inside-gchqs-proposed-backdoor-end-end-encryption
Any whistleblower care to leak? I think Pritti simply did it anyway and all this lying crap is simply to give a legal basis for it. I bet she already backdoored end-to-end encryption, I bet her foreign "allies" are aware of it, and Brits are not, care to leak?
Biting the hand that feeds IT
