Reply to post:

Fusion won't avert need for climate change 'sacrifice', says nuclear energy expert

Binraider Silver badge

Assuming working commercial designs can be up and running within 28 years (Hmmm....!), one then has to stamp them out in adequate numbers to meet demand; plus transmission and, most crucially, the distribution capacity to use them in all the places where oil and gas need to be substituted.

Given the lead time on even a bog standard CCGT is at least 5 years one does not suppose the transition away will be especially quick.

I don't dispute the potential of fusion to end a lot of the worlds problems with energy, but companies don't just decommission perfectly good equipment with decades of life left in it.

Not unless you outlaw / hard end date the older technology through other means.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon