Reply to post: Ransom

Microsoft partners balk at new licensing scheme, dent growth

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Ransom

The annoying phrases are the ones like: "This change is super good for both the partners, the customers, and Microsoft long term" While at the same time seeing the $16billion profits.

This is not "Super plus good" for the resellers. On the M365 level it is a 20% price hike per month OR pay a year up front. I cannot take a risk for a company to pay me monthly and then default on a contract.

It is the stitching up of the reseller is the most unbelievable part. If a client walked out in the middle of an annual package, why is it the Reseller who then has to pay that bill? Why do Microsoft want to penalise us resellers when our clients go bankrupt?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon