Reply to post: Re: Alas poor SOAP!, I knew him

20 years of .NET: Reflecting on Microsoft's not-Java

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: Alas poor SOAP!, I knew him

SOAP failed because it couldn't be standardized. Well it could, but they it'd have to contend with what already worked identically i.e. PHP/C++/PERL/Java/whatever...

"...the hope of universal mini-services"

How about, the hope of locking people in with patented "web" API's...?

Not sure about the "all APIs are hard" bit, can you give an example? If you mean the error-checking/security then sure, but if you mean the interfacing....?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon