Reply to post: Re: I've said it before and I'll say it again

APNIC: Big Tech's use of carrier-grade NAT is holding back internet innovation

Fred Daggy Silver badge

Re: I've said it before and I'll say it again

Slightly, both destination and source address are too short to hold that value. 4 x 8 bit bytes. 256 needs 9 bits to represent.

But, according to Wikipedia's description of a IPv4 packet, there is 40 byte option field. If this isn't exhausted, then that could be perhaps used. But again, you'd need a way to deal with IPv4 only devices that only look at source and destination address.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon