Reply to post: Insider tips: peer-reviewed journals

Academics tell Brit MPs to check the software used when considering reproducibility in science and tech research

W.S.Gosset

Insider tips: peer-reviewed journals

> And let us not forget that in many papers published no detailed raw data in the paper

Supplementary Materials are NOT peer-reviewed. They are not even released to the reviewers -- they have to take it on trust.

"Scientists" can and do get away with murder that way.

Source: Nature's formal written advice to an author protesting an apparently fraudulent "reply" to his work, which he released. Nature is a, if not the, Gold Standard journal globally.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon