Reply to post: Re: Rust Alternatives and Roots

Re: Rust Alternatives and Roots

I think the point some of the commenters are making is that C was designed to not have memory safety, as it was designed to work at the metal level where raw performance was critical. Basically, a unicycle versus a bicycle with training wheels. At some point, you have to insist on people who what they're doing, and if they're not available, throw up your hands and realize You Just Can't Get There From Here.