Reply to post: Re: Questionable value for money?

Should be easy to win the rights to .tv when you're name-checked in the contract's tech reqs – right, Afilias?

Graham Cobb Silver badge

Re: Questionable value for money?

In the case of short memorable domains, I disagree. They can be included in the branding and even in the short, snappy name of the service. It would literally be the word that someone googles.

Of these ".tv" is probably the single most valuable. If your service is called "Wank.tv" (which appears to be registered, by the way) it is pretty memorable to its target audience and its domain name is just its name.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon