Re: Once again
You just proved Mike 137's point, he was referring to Hubert Cumberdale's post and not the article, which you'd notice if you didn't just superficially scan Mike 137's post ;)
You just proved Mike 137's point, he was referring to Hubert Cumberdale's post and not the article, which you'd notice if you didn't just superficially scan Mike 137's post ;)