Reply to post: Re: There's still the old problem

Re: There's still the old problem

@elsergiovolador: what kind of criteria a person must meet to be deemed as "reasonable" ... ?

This question was resolved ages ago in many jurisdictions where people were supposed to be judged by their peers who would obviously be best positioned to judge whether something was reasonable (including notions such as "reasonable doubt", etc.).

So, for instance, to judge whether a tweet was "reasonable" and not "intentionally malicious" I suppose you would be well advised to ask a sample of Twitter users.

Oh... --->