Re: Is this for systemd?
You mean Microsoft's equivalent to Apple's HFS Resource Forks? From 1985?
It's amazing, a company tries to support advanced functionality and because everyone else can only think in flat files the advanced functionality is a mistake.
It's like UNIX "everything's a stream so just hack at the bytes" vs NT "everything's an object and you should use methods to handle them" - idiots try to hack at NT objects because that's the lowest effort option and get surprised when they blow up in their face, so that's *obviously* Microsoft's mistake.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
