Re: And we're surprised?
The fact that the system initially reported the location as being a mile away from the "corrected" location says it all about "accuracy" in this case. The only objective data they had to base the "correction" on was the presence of a dead body a mile away that was dead due to a gun shot, and no closer "event" near the right time in the ShotSpotter system. That is the very definition of fudging the data.