Reply to post: Re: Self sustaining

US boffins: We're close to fusion ignition in the lab – as seen in stars and thermonuclear weapons

The First Dave

Re: Self sustaining

So many issues with this article:

Not differentiating between self-sustaining (it clearly isn't - it is a one-shot system)

Mixing that up with net-positive (only 70% so not that either)

Described as a big milestone, some sort of 'first' - but not at all clear how/what/why: hasn't all of this been done before, (possibly with lower numbers)?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon