Reply to post: "Junk patents"?

Australian court rules an AI can be considered an inventor on patent filings

pip25
FAIL

"Junk patents"?

I think the real problem here is that such patents can be submitted and accepted by the patent system, regardless of their author. If meaningful innovation would truly be a requirement, then a machine capable of solving such real problems on its own would be a genuine asset, not simply yet another source of income for patent trolls.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon