Reply to post: This claim makes limited sense.

The AN0M fake secure chat app may have been too clever for its own good

Anonymous Coward
Alien

This claim makes limited sense.

They say that the volume of content was too large. If this was actual chat (text) then surely a combination of traffic analysis and keyword / text analysis is actually reasonably easy to scale? Perhaps it's all streamed audio video or something which might make the problem harder, but traffic analysis would still be pretty interesting. Perhaps what's happened is that they initially 'marketed' the thing at criminals, but it's now seen take-up amongst too many other people so they can't find the signal from the noise? In which case there's presumably another tool being marketed to criminals which has replaced it.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon