Reply to post: Re: QA person could not

Spy agency GCHQ told me Gmail's more secure than Microsoft 365, insists British MP as facepalming security bods tell him to zip it

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: QA person could not

"You can't blame QA or its practitioners for the calibre of the [product]."

Maybe not, initially, but what about after the first couple of years worth of formal complaints come in following the documented complaints process? There is a properly documented complaints process, right, with proper followup required? And the BS/ISO9000 auditors will want to see how well it's working, right?

You're on thin ice here, but maybe that shouldn't be a surprise.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon