Reply to post: Re: "Code"

Over a decade on, and millions in legal fees, Supreme Court rules for Google over Oracle in Java API legal war

doublelayer Silver badge

Re: "Code"

"Google did not implement the code in question based on the published API specifications, they copied the 11k LOC directly."

The lines concerned were the API specifications and didn't do anything because they just listed functions. They required separate implementations, which Google wrote without copying. If you compiled those lines of code and tried to do anything with them, you couldn't. Not a single one of them ran. This was just a list of names. You are implying otherwise, but we and you know what they were.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon